The Lederer Files: Interview with Howard

4thandinches

4thandinches

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Total posts
90
Chips
0
dont know why you include phil ivey in that, pretty sure he boycotted the WSOP in protest of players not being paid out
By "boycotted" you mean hiding like a coward from the angry Full Tilt mob.
 
dmorris68

dmorris68

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 27, 2008
Total posts
6,788
Awards
2
Chips
0
By "boycotted" you mean hiding like a coward from the angry Full Tilt mob.

Actually no, I'd say you're way off base about Ivey. He had no controlling interest (or rather, interest in controlling) anything at all that went on at FT. That's one thing HL said you can believe, that Ivey could never be reached and resigned from the board for the simple reason he wanted nothing to do with running the company. I think it's pretty clear he had zero visibility into what was going on until everyone else did, and he responded pretty harshly against FT. Not to say his response wasn't in some ways self-preserving, but in that situation I probably would be too.

You can't lay any of this at anyone's feet other than the executives and board members who saw -- or were in a position to see but didn't bother -- what was going on and chose to continue lining their pockets. Bitar & Co are without doubt the most guilty. I can't quite make up my mind as to the degree of culpability of HL and CF, but I think it clear they bear some responsibility if not guilt. As to the rest of the owners/TeamFT, I don't believe they had any idea. That would include Ivey.
 
4thandinches

4thandinches

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Total posts
90
Chips
0
Actually no, I'd say you're way off base about Ivey. He had no controlling interest (or rather, interest in controlling) anything at all that went on at FT. That's one thing HL said you can believe, that Ivey could never be reached and resigned from the board for the simple reason he wanted nothing to do with running the company. I think it's pretty clear he had zero visibility into what was going on until everyone else did, and he responded pretty harshly against FT. Not to say his response wasn't in some ways self-preserving, but in that situation I probably would be too.

You can't lay any of this at anyone's feet other than the executives and board members who saw -- or were in a position to see but didn't bother -- what was going on and chose to continue lining their pockets. Bitar & Co are without doubt the most guilty. I can't quite make up my mind as to the degree of culpability of HL and CF, but I think it clear they bear some responsibility if not guilt. As to the rest of the owners/TeamFT, I don't believe they had any idea. That would include Ivey.
I agree that the others you mentioned were MUCH more culpable, but in the public's eye, Ivey was the face of Full Tilt whether he wanted to admit it or not.
 
Leo 50

Leo 50

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Total posts
1,285
Awards
1
Chips
3
After watching the interviews and watching Lederer’s squirm during a lot of the questions
(although most of them seemed to be softball questions)
I wonder if they would get that FBI guy to analyze his body language.

:cool:
 
dmorris68

dmorris68

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 27, 2008
Total posts
6,788
Awards
2
Chips
0
The Two plus Two Pokercast episode 239 was so much better than the poker news interview.If you haven't listened to it i would recommend it.
http://pokercast.twoplustwo.com/
I'm still catching up on PokerCast episodes -- I started like 2 years ago listening from episode #1 and have been somewhat anal about listening to them in order without skipping any (a bit eccentric I know, but I am what I am). I'm now less than a year behind (up to #190 or so). But I think I might make an exception and listen to this one now. Where I'm up to is a few months past BF after FT has been shutdown by Alderney, nothing is being communicated, initial deals (like the Binion deal) have fallen through, and everyone is highly pissed off. MJ & Adam are to the point of all but calling HL a crook, so it will be interesting to fast-forward and hear how they treat HL in this interview.
 
wagon596

wagon596

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Total posts
3,767
Awards
13
Chips
11
boy, he looks like he has age 15 years in the last 18 months or so. Guess with the chance of going to prison would do that to a person. I think it's called Karma.
 
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

And Still...
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
27,717
Awards
6
CA
Chips
675
Can't believe anyone is jumping to Ivey's defense. Have you guys listened to the PokerCast broadcast? (Ivey was in no form supporting the players).
 
Poker Orifice

Poker Orifice

And Still...
Platinum Level
Joined
Jan 19, 2008
Total posts
27,717
Awards
6
CA
Chips
675
Also, Dwan is a class act, as he quickly came to the Full Tilt player's defense. And he has more credibility in his pinky tham Lederer, Ferguson, and Ivey combined.
And what exactly was he going to do? Who was he going to give the $5mil to? Did he give it up? Did he even pitch it in (or anything in) when it was requested of him?
I'm not knocking Dwan but I think you'd be more informed if you also listened to the Pokercast broadcast (will shed some light on other stuff you've been saying as well).
 
JOEBOB69

JOEBOB69

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Total posts
4,681
Chips
0
cliffs please
Biggest news was to me...
Howard said RB paid himself a 200k monthly salary through Pocket Kings even when Full Tilt was closeing in on haveing 0 money.Howard tried to talk him into not taking anything,RB replied he didn't work for free.CF and HL agreed on a 70k salary even though HL said he knew it would crush his on PR. Then RB said **** it and paid his self 200k.

No one got fired for this major **** up!!!! HL said he thought firing RB would lessen the chances of getting players money back. Reason was because all the licences for the company was in RB name.

He begged all the owners for $$$ to keep the company a float until they found a buyer for the company.No one gave a dime including HL(hahaha) the only one that said he would was Tom Dwan but the poker stars deal came through before they need the $ to keep the lights on for another month.

I would just say listen to the whole podcast,there is a ton of stuff in there.
 
D

dan abnormal

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Aug 26, 2010
Total posts
1,045
Chips
0
Interview with Mike Johnson and crew I felt was much better than what i heard in 4 of the 7 I listened too
 
OzExorcist

OzExorcist

Broomcorn's uncle
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Total posts
8,585
Awards
1
Chips
1
I agree that the others you mentioned were MUCH more culpable, but in the public's eye, Ivey was the face of Full Tilt whether he wanted to admit it or not.

So... if Michelin sold a batch of faulty tyres, you'd suggest we lynch the Michelin Man? Do we blame the sports stars on the front of the Wheaties packet if the cereal inside is bad?

The public is very capable of telling the difference between a marketing figurehead and someone who makes actual decisions.

I think it's obvious to even the most casual observer that Ivey's role with the company was purely a marketing/promotional one. He really did no more (and truth be told, he probably did less) in that role than others like Gus Hansen, Patrik Antonius, Mike Matusow and Tom Dwan.

I'm not passing any judgements here on his actions post-Black Friday. I'm just saying that it's not really fair to hold him to a different standard than the other top-tier sponsored pros on the site.
 
DINGO8MYBABY

DINGO8MYBABY

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 11, 2005
Total posts
345
Chips
0
Is anyone really going to believe anything Lederer says?
 
deucem

deucem

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Total posts
147
Chips
0
Which part(s) of the interview (if any) was the most enlightening on the events/decisions that led to the complete **** up at FTP?
I have only watched the 1st part but have this so far.....

1) HL contradicts himself when he says that a two thirds majority vote by stakeholders was required before a board member could be fired. When pressed and under pressure during a question 10 minutes later he says "the coalition of the forces who where unhappy" only required an easier 51% majority.......So which was it?? :confused:

2) Ray Bitar - "inexperienced, not very well educated with no leadership aura who was basically illiterate" - The coalition of the unhappy.:eek:

3) $443,860,529.89 distributed between April 2007 - BF because "the company had 20 - 30 million dollars in cash that it didn't need.":flybye: :flybye: :flybye: :flybye:
 
Last edited:
okeedokalee

okeedokalee

Glory To Ukraine
Loyaler
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Total posts
5,931
Awards
24
NZ
Chips
1,357
Led er a any relation to a certain Tua da Pharmacy chump...er champ.
 
alaz3r

alaz3r

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 25, 2013
Total posts
309
Chips
0
should be very interesting maybe him and romney can hook up lol !
 
Bowman26

Bowman26

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Total posts
148
Chips
0
He is squirming like a night crawler worm bring put on a fishing hook! Face it no one is ever going to tell the whole truth as they will likely have to take responsibility for it if that every happened. How do these people get to play live poker anymore without everyone bashing them relentlessly?
 
Top