$109 NL HE MTT: 109$

[Geo90]

Game

Hold'em

Game Format

No Limit

Table Format

MTT

Buy-in

109

Currency

$

After two satellites I managed to qualify for the main race, which is a fantastic result for me. I'm always excited when I can compete in such a big race, but I feel like I'm not mentally prepared for these races. I prefer to rely on my intuition instead of rethinking their deal and narrowing the balance of my opponents!

https://www.cardschat.com/replayer/?hand=3a1ow6hg
I managed to double my chips!
It was a bad match: Pf A10s could have been given and thrown out with a different color.
F could have had a larger raise of around 3000-3500.
T is again a 5, which did not change anything, in my opinion the raise is too small again, around 6-7 thousand would have been more ideal, in my opinion R, then came an over lap, which scared me, the check may be good, but here the throw is not an option, pot odds 28%, I was sure that there was so much equitym here that I should not have thrown, in my opinion.

https://www.cardschat.com/replayer/?hand=3a1ow6pa
Pf : It could have followed, but it is not a mistake to clarify.
F : Here's my second pair, I can give it away, but throwing is not a mistake either
T ok
R : The bet was a mistake, why should I wait with the bet? I opened at the flop, then I passed. It doesn't have a 10, so it would have been open on tour. Maybe he has an A7 or A6 that I can beat, and he might give me a smaller stake.
But since he said all-in with 28% pot odds, I couldn't throw two pairs here.
It might be better to roll on a 3bet PF with such marginal cards until I can play them normally.

 

[MTT Database Review]

That ATs hand is terrible. There are obviously no donkbets from BB here.

 

[primrose]

I don't hate the donk in the first hand, although I would lean toward check-calling. But the thing is that what this most looks like from you is flush draw, straight draw, or combo draw that didn't get there. So the raiser could have just value bet QT on the River. Which means you can't fold there, as you said.

Even though I think it's only an inaccuracy, the fact that you decided to lead is probably a little problematic. It shouldn't be your instinct to immediately telegraph your hand if you hit. As the preflop caller, you should start with a check unless you have a good reason not to.

I think the River bet in the second hand is correct. You should fold to the raise though. It's a difficult fold but he's never value bettering a worse hand here, and he's basically never bluffing anything here, especially not for that size. You don't have 28% after the raise.

No one finds this fold, which is again why no one bluffs there. You've just lead after the flush came up and he gives you a good price; what hand would he ever expect you to fold there? It's just not gonna happen. This is at least a set like 85% of the time.

Agree that calling preflop is ok but folding is also fine if you don't feel comfortable playing it.

 

[fundiver199]

Hand1 ATs

Preflop
Standard defend. I would not 3-bet here, because its an UTG open, and it would really suck to get 4-bet.

Flop
The issue with leading out here is, that you more or less force especially UTG to have a real hand, when he continue, and then AT kind of shrink and dont play all that well on the later streets. Its easy to think of this situation as "LOL I have TPTK", but having TPTK on Txx is not the same as having it on Axx or Kxx.

By the time, you get to the river, your pair is often degraded to second or sometimes even third pair, or some obvious draw has completed. So its better to think of the situation as "I have a medium pair", and the goal with a medium pair is usually to get to a relatively cheap showdown. Which obviously you do not achieve by coming out swinging on the flop like this.

Your hand does need some protection, but if you check, its pretty likely, that you will get at least part of that protection anyway by one of the opponents betting and the other folding. And then you are in a better situation on the turn, because now you are against a range, that contain bluffs, and you do not look weak by checking again.

Turn
Its pretty unlikely, he called you on the flop with bottom pair, so this is a good card for you. But even so you need to think about, what worse hands you will get called by, if you bet again? He opened UTG, so if he has a worse TX, its probably only KTs, QTs and JTs, and his range also contain all the overpairs. He could have a flushdraw, but its getting pretty thin already to bet for value, and this is why, I am not a big fan of leading the flop and condensing his range so much.

River
I definitely think, you have run out of value now, and I also think, your hand is degraded to a bluff catcher, when he make a big river bet. The flushdraw missed, but if thats his only bluff, there are not enough bluff combos compared to the possible value combos, that beat you including JJ+, KTs and KX with the flushdraw. So as played I do agree with your decision to check-fold.

Hand 2 76s

Preflop
Opening is fine but especially with a short stack like this I would fold to his 3-bet.

Flop
As played you have to call at least one bet, when you flop a pair. All his broadways missed.

Turn
No reason to lead with this hand, and we are happy, he checked back.

River
I think, he could be pot controlling an overpair on the turn, now that the flushdraw completed, and you beat those hands now, so its fine to go for some thin value. I also like your sizing, because it does not look like, you have committed yourself to the pot, so he could potentially think, he has enough room to come over the top and bluff.

When he raise, its easy to say, that a river raise is always the nuts, and you should fold. But if you look closer at the situation, its pretty weird for him to have a hand, that check back the turn and then wants to raise the river for value. Its pretty much only some kind of slowplay, as in fact it was. But he can also have a lot of hands like AK or AQ with a flush blocker and decide to bluff the river.

Reads on the opponent are important here, but in a $109 MTT I dont mind your call without any such specific reads. So while I did not love your preflop call, I think, postflop is fine and mostly just one of those annoying spots, where the opponent slowplay, and it works for him, because it allow us to catch up.

 

[Geo90]

That ATs hand is terrible. There are obviously no donkbets from BB here.

Who would you elaborate on? Was it a mistake to raise? Should I have played a check call instead?

 

[Geo90]

I don't hate the donk in the first hand, although I would lean toward check-calling. But the thing is that what this most looks like from you is flush draw, straight draw, or combo draw that didn't get there. So the raiser could have just value bet QT on the River. Which means you can't fold there, as you said.

Even though I think it's only an inaccuracy, the fact that you decided to lead is probably a little problematic. It shouldn't be your instinct to immediately telegraph your hand if you hit. As the preflop caller, you should start with a check unless you have a good reason not to.

I think the River bet in the second hand is correct. You should fold to the raise though. It's a difficult fold but he's never value bettering a worse hand here, and he's basically never bluffing anything here, especially not for that size. You don't have 28% after the raise.

No one finds this fold, which is again why no one bluffs there. You've just lead after the flush came up and he gives you a good price; what hand would he ever expect you to fold there? It's just not gonna happen. This is at least a set like 85% of the time.

Agree that calling preflop is ok but folding is also fine if you don't feel comfortable playing it.

Yes, I tried to defend against the draw, but he probably wouldn't have folded to AQ AK anyway, he would have raised with a pair, I think.

So is it better to check-call with a top pair? It was a multiway pot, so I thought I'd open.

Pot odds: what you have to give 10854: (pot 27271+10854) = 28% or am I calculating wrong?

Until I learn to play normally, it might be better to avoid situations like this :/

 

[Geo90]

Hand1 ATs

Preflop
Standard defend. I would not 3-bet here, because its an UTG open, and it would really suck to get 4-bet.

Flop
The issue with leading out here is, that you more or less force especially UTG to have a real hand, when he continue, and then AT kind of shrink and dont play all that well on the later streets. Its easy to think of this situation as "LOL I have TPTK", but having TPTK on Txx is not the same as having it on Axx or Kxx.

By the time, you get to the river, your pair is often degraded to second or sometimes even third pair, or some obvious draw has completed. So its better to think of the situation as "I have a medium pair", and the goal with a medium pair is usually to get to a relatively cheap showdown. Which obviously you do not achieve by coming out swinging on the flop like this.

Your hand does need some protection, but if you check, its pretty likely, that you will get at least part of that protection anyway by one of the opponents betting and the other folding. And then you are in a better situation on the turn, because now you are against a range, that contain bluffs, and you do not look weak by checking again.

Turn
Its pretty unlikely, he called you on the flop with bottom pair, so this is a good card for you. But even so you need to think about, what worse hands you will get called by, if you bet again? He opened UTG, so if he has a worse TX, its probably only KTs, QTs and JTs, and his range also contain all the overpairs. He could have a flushdraw, but its getting pretty thin already to bet for value, and this is why, I am not a big fan of leading the flop and condensing his range so much.

River
I definitely think, you have run out of value now, and I also think, your hand is degraded to a bluff catcher, when he make a big river bet. The flushdraw missed, but if thats his only bluff, there are not enough bluff combos compared to the possible value combos, that beat you including JJ+, KTs and KX with the flushdraw. So as played I do agree with your decision to check-fold.

Hand 2 76s

Preflop
Opening is fine but especially with a short stack like this I would fold to his 3-bet.

Flop
As played you have to call at least one bet, when you flop a pair. All his broadways missed.

Turn
No reason to lead with this hand, and we are happy, he checked back.

River
I think, he could be pot controlling an overpair on the turn, now that the flushdraw completed, and you beat those hands now, so its fine to go for some thin value. I also like your sizing, because it does not look like, you have committed yourself to the pot, so he could potentially think, he has enough room to come over the top and bluff.

When he raise, its easy to say, that a river raise is always the nuts, and you should fold. But if you look closer at the situation, its pretty weird for him to have a hand, that check back the turn and then wants to raise the river for value. Its pretty much only some kind of slowplay, as in fact it was. But he can also have a lot of hands like AK or AQ with a flush blocker and decide to bluff the river.

Reads on the opponent are important here, but in a $109 MTT I dont mind your call without any such specific reads. So while I did not love your preflop call, I think, postflop is fine and mostly just one of those annoying spots, where the opponent slowplay, and it works for him, because it allow us to catch up.

Thank you for your answers!

Yes, that's exactly what I meant, that I'm ahead and I have to protect my cards because many cards can ruin my hand.

I didn't recognize this situation, I'm trying to understand it

In the second game, he trapped me with a turn check. I thought he had AK AQ and bluffed with a strong river.

The river 6 trapped me nicely because I would have easily folded a pair of 7s, and so my dreams are gone again in the main event. I hope I'll learn how to play someday and make it to the final table.

 

[primrose]

Who would you elaborate on? Was it a mistake to raise? Should I have played a check call instead?

So is it better to check-call with a top pair? It was a multiway pot, so I thought I'd open.

These two questions have the same answer, which is that it's about the strength of your range rather than your individual hand.

Say you have ATs on the BN, you RFI, the BB calls you, and you flop the same board. You obviously have exactly the same hand now, but in this situation, it would be a bet almost every time.

The difference between both cases is that as the BN vs the BB, you have a range advantage; you have a stronger hand on average. The solver always bets more if it has the range advantage. That's why as the preflop caller, it's unusual to ever lead this board, regardless of your hand.

I don't think this is as clear-cut as the first replier seems to think because I don't think that just because GTO does something, you need to do it, too. (Also because this board has two connected low cards, the preflop raiser doesn't even have a large range advantage, it's probably pretty modest.) However this particular facet of GTO play is one that I think you should also do practically. I.e., if you defend from the BB and get a Flop where the raiser has the range advantage, you should probably just check your entire range. Junk, middle pair, top pair, draw, set, nuts, doesn't matter, just check everything. This is what first replier meant when he said "there are no donkbets", it's short for "the solver would check 100% of their range here".

So yeah, it's not that it's better to check-call with top pair, it's that it's better to check-call with top pair if opponent has the range advantage.

BTW just to clarify this point, the reason that the preflop raiser has the range advantage is mostly that they already have a range advantage before the flop (because you call super wide on the BB, but don't RFI super wide; this is also why the range advantage is more significant if the raiser was an early position vs. the BN.) This means that the raiser has the range advantage most of the time. The only exceptions are if the board is actually particularly bad for a raising range. For example if the board came 754 rather than 75T, then you would probably have a small range advantage (because the RFI range is full of high cards which all missed); this would be a rare case where leading as the preflop defender is GTO-approved (though probably not with this particular hand).

 

[primrose]

River
I definitely think, you have run out of value now, and I also think, your hand is degraded to a bluff catcher, when he make a big river bet. The flushdraw missed, but if thats his only bluff, there are not enough bluff combos compared to the possible value combos, that beat you including JJ+, KTs and KX with the flushdraw. So as played I do agree with your decision to check-fold.

Idk about this; wouldn't every hand that didn't get there be tempted to bluff the King? Or even a hand like 99 or 88 that doesn't have any logical reason to bluff, couldn't a player just think "aha you didn't bet the River so you didn't have it"?

You're not supposed to donk here, so if you do, I think it pisses people off, and then if you show weakness on the River, it invites a bet, and I would expect bets with bluffs, made hands, and even marginal hands that don't make sense to bet.

 

[primrose]

BTW if you submit a hand to the converter thing, doesn't it also give you a properly formatted hand history? I'd prefer it if you posted that instead of the video for future hands (you can add the video too if you want) because the video requires re-opening and scrolling every time you want to check something, and also it's hard to read on moblie because the chip amounts overlap. Not a big deal but a little annoying.

 

[fundiver199]

Idk about this; wouldn't every hand that didn't get there be tempted to bluff the King? Or even a hand like 99 or 88 that doesn't have any logical reason to bluff, couldn't a player just think "aha you didn't bet the River so you didn't have it"?

Just to clarify for those, who might get confused, we are talking about the ATs hand here. The issue is, that most of those hands, that "did not get there" as well as hands like 99 and 88 were folded on the flop, because the opponent faced a big donk bet with another guy left to act behind him, which force him to play pretty snug and only continue with strong made hands and good draws.

I would be much more inclined to check-call the river, if UTG had folded on the flop and BTN called. Then BTN could have some light floats on the flop closing the action, and we can also pretty much remove QQ+ from his range, because those hands would normally 3-bet preflop. So against a BTN range there would be fewer hands, we lose to, and far more hands, that lack showdown value and might potentially decide to bluff when checked to.

 

[fundiver199]

BTW if you submit a hand to the converter thing, doesn't it also give you a properly formatted hand history? I'd prefer it if you posted that instead of the video for future hands (you can add the video too if you want) because the video requires re-opening and scrolling every time you want to check something, and also it's hard to read on moblie because the chip amounts overlap. Not a big deal but a little annoying.

It also give the option to delete the last part of the hand history, so that the result is not revealed, which makes it easier for people to analyse the hand in an unbiased way. In the ATs hand its not that important to know, that Hero folded. But in the 76s hand it can be difficult to completely ignore, that we know, Hero called and lost to a flush. I am sure, everyone does their best to not let the result impact their analysis, but its just easier, if we dont know the result.

 

[primrose]

Yeah, I'm very pro hiding the result.

 

[Geo90]

Erre a két kérdésre ugyanaz a válasz, mégpedig az, hogy a skálád erősségéről van szó, nem pedig az egyéni kezedről.

Tegyük fel, hogy AT-k vannak a BN-en, visszalépsz, a BB megad, és a flop ugyanazt a boardot hozza. Nyilvánvalóan pontosan ugyanaz a lapod van most, de ebben a helyzetben szinte minden alkalommal tétet kellene tenni.

A két eset közötti különbség az, hogy BN-ként a BB-vel szemben skálád előnyben van; átlagosan erősebb kezed van. A megoldó mindig többet hív, ha skálája előnyben van. Ezért szokatlan, hogy preflop megadóként valaha is kezdőként kezdj ezen az asztalon, függetlenül a kezedtől.

Szerintem ez nem annyira egyértelmű, mint ahogy az első válaszoló gondolja, mert nem hiszem, hogy csak azért, mert a GTO csinál valamit, neked is meg kell tenned. (Másrészt, mivel ezen az asztalon két összefüggő alacsony lap van, a flop előtti emelőnek nincs is nagy skálája előnyben, valószínűleg elég szerény.) Azonban a GTO játéknak ezt a konkrét aspektusát a gyakorlatban is érdemes megtenned. Azaz, ha védekezel a nagy lap ellen, és olyan flopot kapsz, ahol az emelőnek van skálája előnyben, akkor valószínűleg csak checkelni kell a teljes skáládat. Szemét, középső pár, top pár, húzó, szett, nuts, mindegy, csak mindent checkelni kell. Erre gondolt az első válaszoló, amikor azt mondta, hogy "nincsenek donkbet-ek", ami a "a megoldó itt a skálája 100%-át checkeli" rövidítése.

Szóval igen, nem arról van szó, hogy jobb check-call-olni top párral, hanem arról, hogy jobb check-call-olni top párral, ha az ellenfélnek van előnye a laptartományával .

Egyébként, csak hogy tisztázzuk ezt a pontot, az oka annak, hogy a flop előtt emelőnek skálája van, többnyire az, hogy már a flop előtt is van skálája előnyben (mert szuper széles lapokkal megadod a BB-t, de nem RFI-zel szuper széles lapokkal; ezért is jelentősebb a skálája előnye, ha az emelő korai pozícióból érkezett a BN-nel szemben). Ez azt jelenti, hogy az emelőnek az idő nagy részében skálája van előnyben. Az egyetlen kivétel, ha az asztal különösen rossz egy emelő skálához. Például, ha az asztal 754-gyel, és nem 75T-vel érkezett, akkor valószínűleg kis skálája van előnyben (mert az RFI skálája tele van magas lapokkal, amelyek mind kimaradtak); ez egy ritka eset lenne, amikor a flop előtti védekezőként való kezdés GTO-jóváhagyást kapna (bár valószínűleg nem ezzel a konkrét kézzel).

These are thoughts that are beyond my knowledge. Thank you for describing them in such detail. I am grateful that once I learn to play, I will thank you.

But I think I get it, I have to learn to think in ranks. When I look back at the hands, I no longer focus on the specific hand, but try to focus on the ranks, and if I lift off the button, I'm still playing from a position, which is another big advantage.

Then, as a preflop giver, I need to have a card stronger than a couple to bet on multiple streets. For example, two pairs would have been a good game.

Yesterday a thought came to mind: to see if I made a good decision preflop in tournaments, I always check the GTO the next day, in the free section, but there is only ChipEV, ICM is paid, so I might not get accurate Ranges that way? As I get closer to ICM, should I play tighter? Or is there no big difference between ChipEV and ICM scales?

Then I got the answer to my previous question, so in situations like this I should fit, I should fit.

I'll have to go through this a few more times

But in this situation I would think I would beat a lot of his cards if he opened a J10S Q10S K10S, but as a UTG lifter he could have 1010 JJ QQ AA, which I'm at a disadvantage against, or he could bluff with two overlaps that he might not throw away, and as you wrote earlier, he has a good chance of improving on the river.

In such situations, I need to take a closer look at the board and assess the ranks.

 

[primrose]

Yeah your rank and the opponent's. Range advantage is a pretty important concept, I'm sure you can find strategy videos explaining it in much more detail

 

[Geo90]

K.

BTW if you submit a hand to the converter thing, doesn't it also give you a properly formatted hand history? I'd prefer it if you posted that instead of the video for future hands (you can add the video too if you want) because the video requires re-opening and scrolling every time you want to check something, and also it's hard to read on moblie because the chip amounts overlap. Not a big deal but a little annoying.

Of course, if it's easier for you, I'll upload it as soon as possible.

 

[Geo90]

Just to clarify for those, who might get confused, we are talking about the ATs hand here. The issue is, that most of those hands, that "did not get there" as well as hands like 99 and 88 were folded on the flop, because the opponent faced a big donk bet with another guy left to act behind him, which force him to play pretty snug and only continue with strong made hands and good draws.

I would be much more inclined to check-call the river, if UTG had folded on the flop and BTN called. Then BTN could have some light floats on the flop closing the action, and we can also pretty much remove QQ+ from his range, because those hands would normally 3-bet preflop. So against a BTN range there would be fewer hands, we lose to, and far more hands, that lack showdown value and might potentially decide to bluff when checked to.

Thank you for your analysis too!

 

[Geo90]

Yeah your rank and the opponent's. Range advantage is a pretty important concept, I'm sure you can find strategy videos explaining it in much more detail

Yeah your rank and the opponent's. Range advantage is a pretty important concept, I'm sure you can find strategy videos explaining it in much more detail

There's definitely a lot of material, I'll look into it, I need to start putting together a study plan soon, there's so much written about things I'd like more information on, 3bet scales, bet sizing, playing against aggressive players, range advantage.

 

[primrose]

Fwiw while there's a lot of content, it's not, like, an insurmountable amount. Depending on what source you end up using, you're looking at, idk, maybe 12 hours of video content to communicate most of the relevant theory, maybe another 12 for advanced concepts. It's relatively manageable. The harder part is to actually apply it; the theory knowledge will lack behind your practical play for a while.

I've heard rumors CardsChat has their own tutorial, idk how deep it goes or how good it's explained, but probably worth checking out.

 

[Geo90]

Fwiw while there's a lot of content, it's not, like, an insurmountable amount. Depending on what source you end up using, you're looking at, idk, maybe 12 hours of video content to communicate most of the relevant theory, maybe another 12 for advanced concepts. It's relatively manageable. The harder part is to actually apply it; the theory knowledge will lack behind your practical play for a while.

I've heard rumors CardsChat has their own tutorial, idk how deep it goes or how good it's explained, but probably worth checking out.

Are you referring to Winning PokerPlayer in 30 Days?
I'm learning from several sites right now. I'm watching the free video from Raise Your Edge, I usually watch Jonathan Little's YouTube videos, and Carrot Corner also has a lot of useful videos. My colleague linked to them the other day, but I don't have time for everything

It's really hard to implement these things in the game. I'll read through the suggestions here again sometime and try to use them. It's hard to change bad habits

 

[primrose]

Are you referring to Winning PokerPlayer in 30 Days?

No, 12+12 hours was just my estimate, haven't heard of this particular thing.

I'm learning from several sites right now. I'm watching the free video from Raise Your Edge, I usually watch Jonathan Little's YouTube videos, and Carrot Corner also has a lot of useful videos. My colleague linked to them the other day, but I don't have time for everything

That kinda doesn't sound optimal tbh because iiuc you're just watching free content as it comes out. This isn't structured to teach you the basics in a good order, it's essentially a random selection of topics. I'd actually advise not actively following any feeds, and instead using a tutorial.

I think Jonathan Little's introductory course on poker basics on pokercoaching.com may be free of charge. Even if not, there is an offer where you can get access to everything for free for 3 days. This is enough to watch and save copies of every video; that's how I did it.

 

[primrose]

I've also followed Jonathan Little's feed for a little bit and iirc it's probably too advanced. And it has too much of a GTO focus.

 

[Geo90]

Nem, a 12+12 óra csak az én becslésem volt, erről a konkrét dologról még nem hallottam.


Ez nem hangzik optimálisnak, mert én azt hiszem, csak ingyenes tartalmakat nézek, ahogy megjelennek. Ez nem úgy van felépítve, hogy jó sorrendben tanítson meg az alapokat, lényegében véletlenszerűen kiválasztott témákról van szó. Azt javaslom, hogy ne kövess aktívan semmilyen hírfolyamot, ehelyett használj oktatóanyagokat.

Azt hiszem, Jonathan Little bevezető póker alapjairól szóló kurzusa a pokercoaching.com oldalon ingyenes lehet. De még ha nem is, van egy ajánlat, ahol 3 napig ingyen hozzáférhetsz mindenhez. Ez elég ahhoz, hogy megnézd és elmentsd az összes videót; én így csináltam.

Maybe 12 hours won't be enough for me
This is a tutorial for beginners, but you definitely don't need it https://www.cardschat.com/poker/strategy/become-a-winning-poker-player/


Yes, I only deal with free content, and yes, I noticed that all topics are touched on a little bit, but that's why there is a paid department.

I found some free parts of Tournament Masterclass, where can I find the recommended ones?
Unfortunately my English is not the best, but I will start watching these videos and hopefully learn something.
I will also download the book from the site and read it.

Translated with Deepl.com (free version)

 

[primrose]

Unfortunately my English is not the best, but I will start watching these videos and hopefully learn something.

Ah, I didn't think about the language barrier. Yeah, I don't know how good your English is, but if you have trouble following videos, I mean, that's a real problem. I don't know if there are good resources in Hungarian... or if pokercoaching.com videos have subtitles. Probably not.

Idk, in this case I don't think I know what the best resource is. But I guess I'd still recommend spending some time trying to figure out the best resource, it's probably worth it. Maybe it's just a good poker book written in or translated into Hungarian? But I really think that watching random videos is a very inefficient use of your time, so even if you have to spend a few hours trying to find something better, it's probably worth it. (And if you try something and it doesn't work, then don't get stubborn; look for something better.)

I found some free parts of Tournament Masterclass [...]

No no, that's not the right one. Touranment and Cash masterclass on pokercoaching.com are the super advanced courses. There is another course about basics (also from Jonathan Little), and iirc that one is much shorter. That's the one I meant.

 

[Geo90]

Ah, I didn't think about the language barrier. Yeah, I don't know how good your English is, but if you have trouble following videos, I mean, that's a real problem. I don't know if there are good resources in Hungarian... or if pokercoaching.com videos have subtitles. Probably not.

Idk, in this case I don't think I know what the best resource is. But I guess I'd still recommend spending some time trying to figure out the best resource, it's probably worth it. Maybe it's just a good poker book written in or translated into Hungarian? But I really think that watching random videos is a very inefficient use of your time, so even if you have to spend a few hours trying to find something better, it's probably worth it. (And if you try something and it doesn't work, then don't get stubborn; look for something better.)

No no, that's not the right one. Touranment and Cash masterclass on pokercoaching.com are the super advanced courses. There is another course about basics (also from Jonathan Little), and iirc that one is much shorter. That's the one I meant.

In Hungarian, I don't think there are any, and subtitles are only available for YouTube videos, which is already a big help I find it difficult to understand the videos, or I don't understand them at all in English.

Még nem találtam meg a megfelelőt , a könyvek jók, ha angolul vannak, a Chatgpt szépen lefordítja őket, most kezdtem el olvasni a 10 tipp a No-Limit Hold'em versenyek elsajátításához című könyvet, ez egy rövidebb.

I used to think about this book:https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/mystery-bounty-poker-strategy-dara-okearney/1143498972

I find it difficult to understand the videos, or I don't understand them at all in English.

And if you were to pay for a course, which one would you choose? Raise Your Edge? Pokercoaching.com?

Then maybe you meant this: Master The Fundamentals. It's really free, and I'm going to give it a try, since I've already spent a lot of time playing the game

How do you download this video? I don't understand