
Flyer35
Legend
Platinum Level
For those who like scientific studies, they actually did one to address the question of which is predominate in poker - skill or chance. Guess which won?
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
If the game itself is predominately a game of chance, how is it that some professional poker players make a living playing? Because they're not playing the game, they're playing the other players (i.e., the ones who actually believe it's predominately a game of skill). And psychology is definitely a science.
So if you play a live game, and you come away thinking you've been 'worked' or 'manipulated' or 'cheated', whatever you want to call it - you probably have. You think that because the winning player wasn't playing the game by what you consider to be 'the rules'. He was playing you by his own rules. That's why it 'felt' off.
Can that be extended to online poker, where the task of psychological manipulation is more difficult? I would argue - yes, just with more variance.
How about freerolls or low stakes? Likely not, because psychological manipulation plays on perception of real risk, and there is no real risk in these games.
(A) Chance

Is poker a game of skill or chance? A quasi-experimental study - PubMed
Due to intensive marketing and the rapid growth of online gambling, poker currently enjoys great popularity among large sections of the population. Although poker is legally a game of chance in most countries, some (particularly operators of private poker web sites) argue that it should be...

If the game itself is predominately a game of chance, how is it that some professional poker players make a living playing? Because they're not playing the game, they're playing the other players (i.e., the ones who actually believe it's predominately a game of skill). And psychology is definitely a science.
So if you play a live game, and you come away thinking you've been 'worked' or 'manipulated' or 'cheated', whatever you want to call it - you probably have. You think that because the winning player wasn't playing the game by what you consider to be 'the rules'. He was playing you by his own rules. That's why it 'felt' off.
Can that be extended to online poker, where the task of psychological manipulation is more difficult? I would argue - yes, just with more variance.
How about freerolls or low stakes? Likely not, because psychological manipulation plays on perception of real risk, and there is no real risk in these games.
Last edited: