Hey, idk if you saw the other reply but if you are baby_rose contact abarone on twitch/discord because i think u won a main event ticket to LondonAt low-stakes tables, many players tend to limp a lot. Do you think there are situations where limping can actually be profitable, or is it almost always a losing play compared to raising?
At low-stakes tables, many players tend to limp a lot. Do you think there are situations where limping can actually be profitable, or is it almost always a losing play compared to raising?
Yes! There are situations when limping can be profitable! In the UTG and UTG+1 positions, when you have a premium hand and hope that a player will raise and the others will fold or call. You have the option to go all-in or re-raise, giving you a chance to win many chips. Limping in the SB or BB with premium cards is a mistake!
It’s much more likely to limp when you have premium hands in early positions! If you go all-in, you might win a small pot as you said, but considering that premium hands come less often, I prefer this limp!I would think that most thinking opponents would notice if you only limp in early position with premium hands. If the villans dont raise and you give them great odds to over limp you might have 5 players in the hand drawing to their hand instead of 1 if you raised. So this is where AA is great for winning a small hand or losing a large hand when the villans hit 2 pair, trips, a straight, or a flush on you.
If you have enough hands on the villan to know they like to isolate, they probably have enough hands on you to know you only limp premium hands in early position.
OP is not thinking about limping strategies. They are just trying to get to 100 posts, so they can get platinum status and access to more freerolls. Check the numbers of threads, they have started in the tournament and learning poker forums and in this one as wellRaising is almost always better, dont waste your energy thinking about limping strategies