Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="eetenor, post: 6460022, member: 385063"]
Your study point is preplanning a hand using the available data-  Most important data point in this hand is how big is the maniac's stack?  Preflop sizing is fine in a freeroll- As the min cash is within reach our preplan after the maniac calls is to have the best hand and stack them but to be aware of dangerous flops that change that plan----On the flop vs a maniac is this a dangerous flop for us?  Maniacs do not fold why are we betting?  If we expect the maniac to fold their junk why are we betting half pot? If the maniac just called what do we do on turn? They are a maniac why would they check turn or fold on turn to our bet?-----There are times in poker where the weak players just get to win and we cannot even put up a fight---this is that spot because of the bubble and our stack size-- we are OOP on a terrible board vs a player that will not give up and is likely to shove as they did with the nuts or just 1 spade or no spade or an ace or 2 pair or  naked bluff or etc etc- Our preplan thought on the flop is can we call a shove if we bet if no then we min bet or check- our preplan when we check is to fold to the maniacs bet because we cannot get to showdown vs this player type why call the flop bet when the maniac is shoving turn? We have one card that improves our equity that is it are we calling to hit one card so we can then call the turn shove?

QQ is not the hand we want to shove preflop-we want to get value from it post flop but not on this board vs this player
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us