Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rhoudini, post: 6747876, member: 1015282"] Thank you, this was really tough to make, took me almost 1 hour, but now I saved this template for future hands :geek: Thank you so much for your comment, [B]dallam[/B]! As you said "Part 1" I should wait part 2, right? If yes, I will wait before pointing what stands out for me like in the post of [B]BetterThanAvgButNotByMuch.[/B] Wow!! First of all, thank you so much for this detailed comment, [B]BetterThanAvgButNotByMuch[/B]!!! This first sentence already says a lot! I understood what you said. In fact, I am still at the beginning of my "stud career", therefore it will probably be as you said: [I]"But the best experience is actually to lose with them so the lessons actually have a chance to stick."[/I] Thinking about what you said, makes a lot of sense. You said: [I]"You're going to have trouble going low and high and you're going to be stuck inbetween and that's not where you want to be for a big chunk of your chips."[/I] And that's pretty much what happened... I think I have to work out my hand selection for tournaments when stacks are relativelly small. I have just one more question. You said, [I]"The way you're trying to describe your thought process is reactionary as the cards come on the streets."[/I] Do you have any suggestions on how to stop being reactionary? For me as a beginner the way I thought at the moment and also the way I described the hand is quite natural. But not everything that is natural is actually good. Any tips on how to do it, please? And again, thank you so much for your analysis, I am really thankful for your time and effort. I hope in future there are more hands for us to discuss. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us