Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="sandy358, post: 7187554, member: 1040401"]
We are rejamming LJ there, not the BB, the chances of BB waking up are too low, and again, to rejam 25BB we just need to bet 25BB, no need to put your entire stack out with BB considered.

LJ calls with AJo+, ATs+, KJs+ and 77+ and folds 65% of the time. So most of the time we either get the bet and the blinds or flipping and we are dominated comparatively rarely. It is a standard ChipEV rejam.

You actually just range bet on this flop 100% of the time, and for 25% of the pot with TT specifically. You basically have 0% checking frequency on this flop as a SB 3better. I used the 50BB range for SB though, as 25BB ranges do not contain pocket tens as they were rejammed pre 100% of the time, but for the LJ calling range I took was the tighter 25BB version. Nevertheless it still prefers to rangebet.
Again, it can be different with ICM considerations, but we don't have enough info on ICM here.

On the turn, well, we have basically empty ranges as the solver rangebetted on the flop, but in the 0.5% scenario where it checked on the 9c 100% and then folded to a LJ jam around 50% of the time. Considering that the LJ was probably a nit, folding 100% of the time would probably not be that big of an issue.

So turn play was alright, but from the ChipEV GTO perspective preflop and flop were kind of messed up, though playing passively against a nit in general is generally a good way to handle this type of players and especially with potential ICM implications I'd say the hand was handled relatively well.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us