Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="300HPGOD, post: 6426239, member: 305911"]
CO stats are important here, their 3 bet % will go a long way in determining how wide they are.  Also I would think CO would see the stack size of UTG2 and if they are 3 betting here then they would almost certainly be planning to call a jam from UTG2.  With that I think you have little fold equity with any 4 bet sizing other than getting it in.  If you wanted fold equity with a 4 bet without going in then I believe your sizing would need to be at least in 17 BB range which is over 1/3rd of your stack.  So imo this is a call or jam spot.  Im not in love with jamming here unless CO has a large 3 bet %.  Calling does have its own issues since yes we will be out of position but we also still have UTG2 to act after us and they could jam over both of us here.  We at that point are priced in to call (assuming CO just calls) but then we are playing a really large pot out of position.  I dont like folding AK here either so in reality I am not in love with any option we have but we always have to strive to choose the best one.  I hate 4 betting to an amount not all in, I dont like folding, I dont like jamming, and calling seems like the least worst option to me especially since it is a small 3 bet in size made by CO.  Still drawbacks to it but seems like it has the least baggage associated with it imo.  Interested in what others say here as I have made many mistakes in these types of spots where I am in the blinds with this type of hand facing this type of action.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us