Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="300HPGOD, post: 6675580, member: 305911"] This is a jam pre based on the given stack sizes of others. It would be more interesting if say low chip villain had what they had (or maybe 100-200 more) and other low chip villain had 1150 instead of slightly more than us. But with us being in 3rd at the moment (I know next blind is theirs) and a hand like A7 heads up with 10 BBs we should be jamming this pre. I think in this spot with these stacks villains have I would be playing jam or fold poker pre flop. I really hate limping here as you did unless its a scenario where we know villain will raise or jam over our limp at least 75% of the time. Then I am fine with limping to induce and my intention would be when I limp is to get all in pre flop... I am just letting villain do it with a wider range than what they would presumably call me off with if I had jammed. Problem with that is if you have to know villain will raise or jam on you often and not sure we know that unless we have played against this villain in several STTs. There is one player that I occasionally play against (wont name) that I would absolutely limp to in this given spot since they would jam over me at least 90% of the time and I try to take advantage of their over aggression when the effective stack is 12 BBs and less. Here though, I just dont know if we know that so jamming imo is by far the better play. The above is nice but just not sure how much we can trust it since we are going against a human and not a computer that would be playing perfectly. We come to the same conclusion and jam but in the end it will always come down to what do I think my opponent does here in these spots if I were to do a set action? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language