Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="300HPGOD, post: 6836829, member: 305911"] Pre: We have less than 30 BBs and we are defending from an UTG open against a player that we say in our own words is a good aggressive player. So why are we defending here? We are not super deep so we can of course accumulate chips but its not like we can get 100 BBs in chips from defending here. This opponent raised from UTG giving them a higher chance of a good hand meaning we should be defending less combined with this is not a min open but a 2.5x open so math also dictates we should defend less. Lastly, you say they are good and aggressive... then how do we plan to outplay them out of position during the hand? Maybe you have an answer to that as you were at the table and I was not but we have to know this before we call here. Without knowing anything about you or the table dynamics I feel this may have been an unfortunate situation where if you were dealt J7 off you would have folded without thinking about it but since they were suited you felt like you "had to" defend. Flop: We have an SPR of 2.5 to 1... why are we leading pot here? Again, in your own words this is a player that is good and aggressive meaning they will c bet often so why not just check and let them bet? Leading here, full pot especially, gives them a reason to get out of this hand. I dont want AQ to have a reason to get out of this hand or QQ. Just check here and let the aggressive villain bet. If they check behind its not the end of the world either as you can bet turn for just over 10k to setup a river jam. As played, you bet pot and they jam over you... what do you put them on that is less than what you have that does this? The flop is rainbow so there are less draws to worry about (only straight draws). You mention AA... I think a villain like you are describing just calls with AA as they would not want you to only continue with better hands if they were to raise. The raise here would tell me something big. I dont think I would fold either in your shoes as played but I would never have got myself in this spot calling pre and then leading for pot. What you wound up doing was taking your own options away in the hand since you are committed after leading pot there with 2 pair imo. The way to play this hand was to fold pre. If you did defend then you should have checked to the raiser who you knew was aggressive and let them bet. From there if you want to call to keep in their bluffs and one pair hands thats good and depending on their sizing if you want to get it in over them should they make a large bet on the flop thats fine too (although, against an agg I think calling is better with no intention of folding). Losing all your chips on this hand ONCE YOU CALLED PRE is not bad but its how you played the hand post flop that is not good in the long run. It will make you win the least when you flop it big and of course big hand vs big hand with under 30 BBs you will lose it all anyway but the takeaway is how to extract the most when you are ahead and that is not by leading here and especially leading with a pot sized bet. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language