Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="300HPGOD, post: 6672661, member: 305911"]
Disclaimer:  I do not play anywhere near $109 buy in sizing so keep that in mind with my opinions below

Hand 1: jumping to the flop I like betting here but am betting for a larger amount than you did.  I want folds here as turns and river will usually be overcards that I will not really be sure of where I am at.  Betting as small as you did you could get floated by pairs that otherwise would fold to a 40-45% bet with two overcards on the board (If they have 66-99 for example) so I like betting here to induce folds and not such a small sizing that could be interpreted as :an entire range" c bet sizing.  It is a fold once they raise.

Hand 2:  Hand 2 is different as the board is paired.  I think we can check the flop here a lot since we could have checked the flop with a K here as some players do and others bet but the point is villain isnt going to necessarily think checking is weak here.  If you are going to bet I like your sizing this time as we would be betting smaller with Kx and we would not be targeting folds.   After we bet and get raised, how often is villain raising here with Kx risking a fold on a rainbow board with the only OESD being QJ?  I would not think they would raise or at least not anywhere near all the time so I think this is a raise where its not an automatic fold.  Depending on what we think about villain here we can call and see what they do on turn, or even raise bluff here.  Folding, I think, is fine but its just not an auto fold to me like it is in hand 1 when we get raised since villains better hands that would actually raise in this spot are more limited in number.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language