Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6550562, member: 397965"]
The fact, SB went with something as bad as 74, kind of highlight this point. When his range is this wide, there is more merit to C-betting the flop. But not with a big sizing. If he has a hand like 96 rather than 74, he is going to fold regardless of your sizing, and if you go small, there is actually a better chance, he just call with 74 rather than check-raise. This is, because when you go so big, calling the flop kind of commit him to the pot. If he call the 683, pot is going to be around 2.400, and he will only have around 1.000 left.

So you are essentially forcing him to make a decision for all his chips right there on the flop. If you bet 300 instead, he likely just check-call, and then you can check back turn and see all 5 cards without putting in more than those 300 chips. And then you can just give up on the river, when you fail to improve. This is not the kind of player, we want to be bluffing, and we knew this already from his preflop stats. Someone playing 40/3 is always a recreational player, and combined with the very low buyin, its not surpricing, that he wont fold, when he catch a small piece of the flop. Which is why, we can get a lot of value from this kind of player with our strong hands, but we cannot bluff them.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language