Reply to thread by Casino.us

Message: [QUOTE="dmorris68, post: 1638925, member: 40397"] Regarding the Rush HUD, it works fine for me in HEM so I'm not sure how it could be better in PT3, unless perhaps it shows Hero stats (HEM's Rush HUD doesn't display for the Hero at all, which does annoy me). The whole Rush HUD thing was funny: initially PT3 beat HEM to the punch with the first Rush HUD, but everyone complained that their 1st attempt was broken and useless. Then HEM caught up with a "real" Rush HUD that initially was said to blow PT3's away. Then PT3 fixed theirs and apparently it leapfrogged HEM's, which had some trouble with OCR reliability at first. And on and on. Currently, as I said, I've had no issue whatsoever with Rush HUD in both FR and MTT games -- my only complaint would be lack of a hero HUD (only in Rush). IMO the very nature of Rush makes it harder to keep up with your own stats and tendencies so hero stats are even more important. One thing to realize is that these products, particularly the HUD features, can be quite sensitive to user PC configurations, HUD configurations, etc. So while looking at the forums it looks like a lot of people can't get a Rush HUD to work, in reality there are many of us who have no trouble with it. I expect you see the same things at PT3: a gaggle of users complaining that feature X isn't working properly at site Y, but support can't reproduce the problem and other users chime in to say theirs works fine. I see that a lot at the HEM forums. Being in my 3rd decade of working in the software development field, I can appreciate that the innumerable variables involved in software deployment environments make it extremely difficult to test/reproduce every scenario. Some of the other features you mention do make it sound like PT3 has the upper hand, and if they're crucial to you then I can certainly understand the propensity to swing in their direction. However both are in a constant race to out-do each other, and both tend to copy the others' innovations (as tends to happen between competitors), so I don't expect any significant gaps to remain for long, in either direction. I was referring to coaches here, i.e. the ones making the videos, so I was assuming (perhaps incorrectly) that they would have higher demands from tracking software than noobs who were just reacting to the prettier UI. But that's strictly speculation on my part. For instance, at DTB, Hunter Bick prefers PT3 because that's what he started with and knows, but just about every other coach I can think of uses and recommends HEM (and not just the cash coaches). Granted not all coaches are expected to be PC literate and some might actually be making the same noob decisions when it comes to the software, so that observation probably doesn't mean much. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread by Casino.us

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us