Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Discussion
Poker Rooms
Should sites confiscate funds for "unethical play"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6076592, member: 397965"] I used to think the same way, but actually even such cases should rightfully be handed over to the police and then go to court, as it happened recently in a case against a danish pro. Allowing a game operator, who has an obvious interest in keeping peoples money, to act as both police and judge, is pretty questionable to say the least. Moreover its one thing to confiscate winnings, that were achieved in a dishonest way, but its another thing to confiscate whatever deposit, the player might have made. In theory a player could deposit a million dollar, then cheat himself into a winning of 10$ in a SnG and have his million confiscated. This is obviously an extreme example, but my point is, money deposited belong to the player, it does not belong to the poker site. Accepting anything else is like saying, that if you go to a bar and start a fight or in other ways break their rules, then the bar should be allowed to keep your 1 million dollar car, that you parked outside. Or your coat, which you left in the wardrope. This is true, and if I had known, that the original reddit post had been deleted, I would not have started this thread, or I would have titled it different, as a moderator later did for me. But that being said its still a fact, that the TOS of ACR allow them to confiscate peoples money, if they deem, that "unethical play" took place. So you are kind of saying, that this is ok, as long as they dont actually do it? But if they never actually do it, why does it need to be in the TOS? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Discussion
Poker Rooms
Should sites confiscate funds for "unethical play"?
Top