Reply to thread by Casino.us

Message: [QUOTE="I Live Poker, post: 7122556, member: 424044"] Some time ago I excluded all my main poker rooms, due to indignation with the nature of poker, together with the security flaws disclosed and proven by users, as well as some other flaws presented even by the rooms (which is much more honest). So somehow the sum of everything led me to take this impulsive action. However, poker has never caused me any financial harm, nor even to my mental or physical health (lucky me). Quite the contrary, I developed intellectually, learned a lot more about English, to be able to better understand poker slang, and communicate with the global poker community, especially here on cardschat. Now, 7 months later, I have been checking what I could do to play, and in most rooms there is no reversal, even though it states that the self-exclusion is for an "indefinite period". Except for PokerStars, which has a minimum period of 1 year to reactivate the account, and also at Party Poker, which I managed to explain and reopen my account a short time ago. The rest: 888poker, GGpoker, ACR and WPTglobal were unable to reopen. Do the self-exclusion rules vary? What defines whether an activity is healthy or not for a person? What kind of protection is this that the person activates themselves? This sounds like: "I need help!!! Pause; Just a minute and I'll save myself!" Is there some kind of resentment on the part of the rooms in this bureaucratic issue of reactivation, or is it just a lack of human communication and common sense? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread by Casino.us

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us