Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DS3, post: 6484475, member: 407846"] I am now, if paying any attention, trying to watch/listen to some peripheral content, just to see what is revealed as people can't help themselves from exposing themselves as even more questionable. So I listened to Nick Vertucci being 'interviewed' by his podcast partner Veronica Brill, just to see what came up. The podcast sort of kicked off with them saying though they feel Joey Ingram should be allowed 'his process' neither appreciated Ingram allowing anyone on his show to say anything, with Ingram not bothering to push back, or blocking other guests from seriously questioning what they were claiming. I agree - this is what really turned me off Ingram in recent podcasts. For instance he had 'Beanz' on his show again. Beanz had admitted he got Robbi on the HCL stream after meeting her twice only (?) and the second time he got a $20K loan from her(?) which he admitted he had yet to pay back(?). Ingram then stopped the likes of Deeb and Brill from pressing him on details or even asking for serious answers about his background of people calling him a scammer. Very annoying as he allowed Beanz to portray himself as a good guy. Unfortunately for Inspector Ingram within hours people were posting the official charges which Beanz is facing this month for defrauding the PPP (Covid) program for over $300K in St Louis. Now, in the meantime, Christian Soto at the end of one of Matt Berkey's podcast noted Beanz was trying to call in and Berkey got really irritated at Christian. Berkey flat out refused and said Beanz is a scammer, as was his best friend who had scammed Berkey himself and so he was not going to get the time of day from Berkey or get on the show. I cite this situation simply because Berkey is evidently prepared to take a moral stand with such characters and Ingram is not. However, it all loops back to the Hustler Stream and what Vertucci and Feldman were allowing, even encouraging. Beanz is one of the dubious figures who was playing on the Hustler Stream, wheeling and dealing to get others on the stream and to receive loans. It appears he was not vetted (he had a reputation already) or subsequently others such as Robbi and the RIP either. I already said sometime ago I think this was the intentional set up of the show. A revolving cast of questionable people, amid the regulars, whose sole entry was whether they had funds to play. No questions asked...and I suppose, let's hope this does not blow up in our faces. But, it gets even more ludicrous. Brill on the Vertucci podcast asked him who employed Bryan Sagbigsal, the thief. Vertucci said as production started Feldman said Sagbigsal had applied to be an intern, got employed and then promoted. Brill asked about his background check. Vertucci then admitted that they had never done a background check on Sagbigsal. In fact they had never done any background checks on any HCL staff. Further Vertucci admitted he had never done a reference/background check on anyone who had ever been in his employ and that he had now realized that 'he had 'effed' up'. You have got to be kidding me. This is how amateur hour the entire production was regarding guests or staff being vetted. Millions on the table, all the tech needed to produce and present a glossy stream whilst not even bothering with hiring practices that would meet the local McDonald's standards. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language