Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6480723, member: 397965"]
1. Yes basically this is the hypothesis for, how cheating could potentially have taken place. And its not sophisticated. On the countrary its a rudimentary system. But in a high security stream and after the Mike Postle case, its the best, anyone could potentially do, if they wanted to cheat on a stream. And as for being biased, maybe you should take a look at yourself?

Why is it so important for you to not be open to the idea, that cheating might have taken place? Because she is a woman, and woman dont cheat? Or woman are bad at poker, so its natural, she would make a really crazy play? I cant help feeling, that if she had been a guy, a lot of peoples opinion about this incidence might have been a bit different.

2. Agree on that.

3. I agree with your definition of a recreational player. But just because someone dont play for a living, does not mean, they are clueless about poker. Bill Klein played on the previous stream. He is not a professional player, but he is almost as good as the pros, and he take the game serious. He dont come just to have fun and donate his money to the pros.

So seeing someone play pretty well in a high stakes game for hours, and then suddenly make the most crazy call ever seen on TV is certainly not normal. You can just look at Bart Hanssons natural reaction, when the hand took place. "She called????? I wonder if there is a graphics error???" And he have watched more live stream hands than anybody else, since its basically his business.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language