Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DS3, post: 6478710, member: 407846"] As expected from you, a sensible post. Obviously I am in the camp the Garrett had cause to be suspicious....Andy Stacks was also mortified and Mike X said he wanted to vomit (apparently [U]everyone[/U] was shocked as the cards were revealed). That said, I lean towards it was nothing more than a horrendous call after which she started immediately amending her story to lend herself some credibility. In the hand she [U] twice [/U]stated she did not have a three when questioned by other players. Now that is written is stone by her and her 'supporters' that she misread her hand, she thought she had a three. No. She Didn't. Since then her story has changed relentlessly. Actually the same starts to apply to Hustlers which at one point was saying they were making a big announcement in hours about 'activity' identified on the stream...and then Nick Vertucci had to 'admit' they had been misinformed (?). I believe many are now shapeshifting as they see which ways the wind blows and how they will benefit. Regarding Robbi Jade Lew, I have already spent some time detailing her changing 'facts' and I am running with the idea she is not the most honest of gals. This idea she is brand new to the game is an invention, but then even her Hendon Mob page was somehow amended in the middle of the furor (don't ask me). I believe like a million others attempting to 'brand' themselves Robbi was looking for a public profile more than anything else - literally any way to build the Twitter followers and as this situation blew up she (and her husband) have grabbed the opportunity of notoriety with both hands. Regarding the matter of staking - that has been exposed to some degree. When she played that stream, she introduced a friend to play, RIP (Jacob). What they did not reveal was that they were actually partners and after being forced to admit it, Robbi said he had staked her at least 50%. But then it got hazy as she claimed 'many' buy pieces of her (how or why when she had only played three streams?) Prior to that it was thought her lawyer husband was bankrolling her. That said, once I heard that she has now offered to play Garrett (or anyone) [B]naked[/B] on an 'Only Fans' paid for stream (to prove no cheating was taking place -arf arf!) I think we all got a true spell about what she is all about and maybe one and all should stop taking this matter seriously. But for the fact that Garrett is sat with over $139K which might not be his, and if he was sensible, I think he should hand over the funds to an independent party until that matter is adjudicated. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language