Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="jonaselloco, post: 6477129, member: 1003394"] Hi friend. I didn't know about the situation so I did some research to get advice. Of all the conclusions that were drawn, it really seems to me Next: 1st No one doubts that you have to be half crazy to make that call as the woman did, but it was done and in truth Garrett, no matter how many odds / outs he has, did not have the hand won, much less, he was making a semibliff and it came out very wrong. 2nd If Garrett instead of being against the lady, his hand had happened facing Phil Ivey, he would not have made any claim. The claim was made because I am reading that the lady was not well known. If you see the video that I leave you below, could it be said that Ivey cheated and knew what cards the opponent had??? 3rd Garrett was upset because the woman, who had the money to pay that bet, paid and played to make him look stupid. 4th Perhaps also analyze that the woman has seen him make this type of plays to Garrett, she analyzed her game and played it that she won the big hand. Because to tell the truth, the hand is memorable. What's more, I think that if I'm in Garrett's place I get up and play chess or some other game. 5th If you have played cash tables, you know very well that if a character with money thinks he beats you with 43 and you have AA he pays you the same, and if he sees a turn and thinks you were bluffing a character with money he pays you Same. To consider, somewhere I read that the lady is the wife of a very famous and wealthy lawyer. That she knows any of us if the lawyer is angry with Garrett and told the woman: "dear, pay Garrett with anything, make him look stupid, I'm your bank" 6th The contradictory part of women. If she had normally won that hand she wouldn't have had to make the excuses she did. She should have said "I knew he was bluffing, I paid and took the consequences" and full stop. Nothing to give so many explanations. If I lost I was like a stupid and he was like a hero, and if I won I was the hero and he was like an idiot. There are certain things that came to my mind. Of course, the reason or truth is neither you, nor I, nor anyone else. Only the owners of the TV show and the Casino will know what really happened. I must give you the reason that this propaganda is not profitable for the Casino. Last time in another post you replied to what I thanked you for, with information about the case of a player who had been denounced for cheating or fraud, just as there have been many denounced for this reason. For the Casino it is a lousy advertisement. I tell you that I am not against your comment, on the contrary I like it because you detailed it very clearly, and it is seen that you follow this television show made from a Casino. It happens, I think that when there is money at stake, mmmm, a fight of this type is always going to happen. That's why I don't like everything that is cash tables. I can sit for days watching an MTT anywhere in the world, but cash tables I don't waste a second of my time. Greetings friend, and thanks for letting me express. I may be wrong, but at the end of the day, it's just another thought. ;););)(y)(y)(y) [MEDIA=youtube]g4khKhg1Otw[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language