If the site allows you to use it, why not use it, but be careful when using it, they are just statistics, a player can change his way of playing over time.What's your thoughts and experiences?
I do prefer not using a HUD but i do use the software to track my game. The issue with a HUD is it really takes a lot of hands to get a true picture of a player. To many times i have heard people make comments about a player but only based on a few hands and that can be really dangerous. Another problem is people can change over time. Today you play 200 hands, and they have a vip of 35%. You have them marked as A LAG or worse. 10 months later you meet up and look to punish him but he has been working on his game and now only is raising 12% of hands. You see the problem as you LAG is now a NIT. Using a HUD is OK but you need to be carfull using them as well.
And you need to be aware, how large a sample is needed for certain statistics to be meaningfull. If someone has folded to a flop C-bet 75% of the time, but its 3 times out of 4, then that does not really mean anything other than maybe he missed flop completely 3 times. But with that being said a HUD can certainly give usefull information. So if its allowed, you put yourself at a disadvantage, if you dont use one. Its less important though, if you play in large field MTTs, where you rarely pick up a large sample on anyone. But for cash games and SnGs a HUD is a very usefull tool, if you know how to use it well.If the site allows you to use it, why not use it, but be careful when using it, they are just statistics, a player can change his way of playing over time.
You can set up your HUD to only show stats after they become statistically significant. Stats like VPIP become meaningful much faster than stats like fold to 5b etc.I do prefer not using a HUD but i do use the software to track my game. The issue with a HUD is it really takes a lot of hands to get a true picture of a player. To many times i have heard people make comments about a player but only based on a few hands and that can be really dangerous. Another problem is people can change over time. Today you play 200 hands, and they have a vip of 35%. You have them marked as A LAG or worse. 10 months later you meet up and look to punish him but he has been working on his game and now only is raising 12% of hands. You see the problem as you LAG is now a NIT. Using a HUD is OK but you need to be carfull using them as well.
I'm used to play with Hud, but is not indispensable to me. Although it helps a lot when I'm multitabling more than 5-6 tablesSome online players claim they are indispensable others only play on sites that do not allow them. What's your thoughts and experiences?
I have experimented with not having the HUD pop up until after a certain amount of hands like 20, 30, 40 or even 50. For a while I was happy with this, but I went back to letting the HUD show any available information, because there were some hands, where I had clearly missed out on usefull information. One of the issues is, that there is no black and white number, where information suddenly becomes "statistically significant". Instead its a gradual process of variance in numbers going down but never disappearing completely.You can set up your HUD to only show stats after they become statistically significant. Stats like VPIP become meaningful much faster than stats like fold to 5b etc.