Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="kon44, post: 6658560, member: 1010262"] [USER=1016489]@UnderDawg5501[/USER], 100% that was amongst the lines of deliberations brought up and put to the topic at the time. A hard pill for a few (who am I kidding lol, VERY many lol) to swallow on this forum but I’m actually the biggest sceptic to have amounts to debate. The guy in question is the biggest poker nit I’ve met in my life, a quality I massively respect him for but at the same time have always taken that knowledge and when we get to play (he only plays in his larger entry organised games) taking absolutely ludicrous liberties and advantage of this stubbornness in his game. When I see him I always enquire about the RNG and how it’s treating him, and for over a year it’s been the same. His been luckier, luckier to such a degree it’s massively noticeable. I’m someone’s that if I was told that something had happened 9 times in a row already, I’d still argue it’s possible and still very likely that it may be different on the 10th occasion. Highly probably of the mimicking of past results but not 100% as the mathematical statistics already show. Tenth man ideology has merit and is essentially more important in all things. Variance is something that most find exceptionally hard to perceive. The reason is that most minds find comfort in singularity instances as often as possible, the unknown, uncharted, unscripted is a torture to confront and be comfortable with..... I had a couple of ethical hackers friends years back who I continually asked and picked the minds of lol. There are soo many things possible that would have you binning your electronics. If any of you have watched the new Luther film..... that tech that jumps into your devices... its been around over a decade [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language