Defying the odds

[Anamembu]

I love the euphoria of the reporters haha! What do you think about this hand? I'll read your comments.🍀

 

[georgi krastev]

Nice fold...

 

[jonaselloco]

I have seen this hand many times.
That is what I told you in your other post about bluffs.
First, for me that opening 45 was not worth too much, but well let's assume it's fine. Villain's payment with 22 is super logical.
Second, if villain on the flop reraises you, he's definitely proposing something. The question is, what is he proposing??? If you see the flop, there is almost no doubt that villain is minimally with a set, or with the possibility of making a supposed flush. If you think so, why does he make you keep paying for a 2-point straight ??? I really don't see much point in it.
Third, if you are so convinced of your hand, why not go allin on the river??? Ultimately, the villain went all-in with chips that the hero could easily have paid. And that I don't pay!!!
Conclusion: For a reason the villain was a representative of partypoker and the hero was left as an idiot hahahaha
The performance allin was easy to call, but really just seeing the idea that there's a flush possibility at showdown makes you wonder.

 

[Anamembu]

I have seen this hand many times.
That is what I told you in your other post about bluffs.
First, for me that opening 45 was not worth too much, but well let's assume it's fine. Villain's payment with 22 is super logical.
Second, if villain on the flop reraises you, he's definitely proposing something. The question is, what is he proposing??? If you see the flop, there is almost no doubt that villain is minimally with a set, or with the possibility of making a supposed flush. If you think so, why does he make you keep paying for a 2-point straight ??? I really don't see much point in it.
Third, if you are so convinced of your hand, why not go allin on the river??? Ultimately, the villain went all-in with chips that the hero could easily have paid. And that I don't pay!!!
Conclusion: For a reason the villain was a representative of PartyPoker and the hero was left as an idiot hahahaha
The performance allin was easy to call, but really just seeing the idea that there's a flush possibility at showdown makes you wonder.

Thank you for your comment, it's a very insightful perspective on what happened. I appreciate your analysis

 

[dregan]

Having a set, it was necessary to defend it with higher raises. The flop could have a flush draw or a pair of eights. And on the turn, generally go all-in, since the opponent had a smaller stack.

 

[Anamembu]

Having a set, it was necessary to defend it with higher raises. The flop could have a flush draw or a pair of eights. And on the turn, generally go all-in, since the opponent had a smaller stack.

Thank you for your analysis. Greetings