Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Tero, post: 7068206, member: 415793"] Call me cynical but I have a very negative view about those sites that offer long term backing even for small stakes players. I'm not saying that they all are garbage but who knows? Starting split of winnings is usually 50/50 but if you keep losing you still owe them makeup. And the amount you need to play is beyond me. 300 games a month is pretty the much minimum norm. I've seen a one happy camper though. The Danish streamer Daniel Petersen doesn't keep it a secret that he is a fully backed player. Even the fact that he is currently over half a million dollars in makeup doesn't seem to concern him. But I guess he has a much better deal than 50/50? Not that I would ever want to become anyone's milking cow, are there any upsides that I might have missed? Being able to play higher stakes than I normally would is not an upside in my view. [/QUOTE]