Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diabloblanco, post: 345955, member: 4734"] Mario999, if you're refering to me when you said I was "a dummy," allow me to retort. I will repeat my original statement for you and this time I will type it slow so you can understand it. If it helps you to read it aloud, feel free to do so. [B]If you can't consistantly beat the lower buyin tournaments and the lower level games, you will not be a long term winner by moving up in limits.[/b] If you think that is a sound strategy, you are mistaken, there isn't even a valid argument you will put forth to support your claim. You also have no concept of bankroll management, variance, or regression to the mean. All terms I don't expect you to know. *shrug* If you think because you did good in [b]one[/b] 30+3 tournament you can compete with the "big dogs," allow me to be the first one to explain to you that the "big dogs" are playing much higher than 30+3. You played with decent players who beat the 3/6 games. I understand you think I am a "dummy" so you'll probably read this and still swear by Mary that you're right and I honestly couldn't care less. However, when I see someone make a post that's general idea is severely flawed and makes absolutely no common sense, I usually comment on it. PS-I aint no dummy, dummy. Mario999, if you're refering to me when you said I was "a dummy," allow me to retort. I will repeat my original statement for you and this time I will type it slow so you can understand it. If it helps you to read it aloud, feel free to do so. [B]If you can't consistantly beat the lower buyin tournaments and the lower level games, you will not be a long term winner by moving up in limits.[/b] If you think that is a sound strategy, you are mistaken, there isn't even a valid argument you will put forth to support your claim. You also have no concept of bankroll management, variance, or regression to the mean. All terms I don't expect you to know. *shrug* If you think because you did good in [b]one[/b] 30+3 tournament you can compete with the "big dogs," allow me to be the first one to explain to you that the "big dogs" are playing much higher than 30+3. You played with decent players who beat the 3/6 games. I understand you think I am a "dummy" so you'll probably read this and still swear by Mary that you're right and I honestly couldn't care less. However, when I see someone make a post that's general idea is severely flawed and makes absolutely no common sense, I usually comment on it. PS-I aint no dummy, dummy. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language