Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="F Paulsson, post: 348598, member: 6979"] It's hard to find a specific hand to deal with what I consider my largest problem: Playing short-handed (4-6 people left). The balance of being more aggressive vs. not overvaluing cards. I've played a few more SnGs now, and I'm starting to get a bit more comfortable with how to play them up until that point. Here's a relatively typical example of what my problem is: PokerStars Game #2533240589: Tournament #12332303, Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2005/09/09 - 02:28:44 (ET) Table '12332303 1' Seat #4 is the button Seat 2: Player1 (3420 in chips) Seat 4: Player2 (2360 in chips) Seat 6: Me (3755 in chips) Seat 8: Player3 (3965 in chips) FPau: posts small blind 100 beaz1975: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Me [:qh: :as: ] Player1: raises 400 to 600 Player2: folds Me: raises 400 to 1000 Player3: folds Player1: calls 400 *** FLOP *** [:ks: :7h: :6c: ] What actually happened was this: Me: checks Player1: bets 1000 Me: folds Player1 collected 2200 from pot Player1: doesn't show hand´ My fold once he bet felt like the right thing to do, but did I act somewhat correct pre-flop? How should I react to this particular flop? Blinds were being stolen left and right at this table, with the four of us left, otherwise I might have been more conservative in raising this particular hand. Perhaps I overraised it. Should I have folded preflop? Called? Cheers, --F PS. Oh yeah, being that I'm new here, I'm not sure if there's an etiquette problem with posting hands outside of the hand analysis forum. I posted here because I wanted it in the context of what we were already talking about (and specifically how to continue where the Moneymaker strategy stops), but if that's rude, I apologize. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language