I think this is a common misperception for players who don't play on Z00M. I believe it is looser and much more aggressive.I think many regs are just waiting for the nuts on zoom
Ranges will differ depending how much you know about your opponents. Most of times are unknown players, but if you constantly play Zoom you will notice fishes, then you can adapt your range.Hello, for those who play both modalities, do you use the same range of hands or so to speak the same tables to play?
I love playing Zoom, but I also have a good regularity at the regular tables!Hello, for those who play both modalities, do you use the same range of hands or so to speak the same tables to play?
Nope. Nothing wrong mate. I’m playing Zoom now, maybe one thing or another had changed.Something not ok @Aballinamion ?
Only shared my opinion/experience. Played and observed many hands there years ago 😉
Ok so what exactly?Nope. Nothing wrong mate. I’m playing Zoom now, maybe one thing or another had changed.
I’m not sure if most of players use a tracker, for the amount of mistakes they make preflop and postflop is preposterous: one top thing I’m observing is overbet. They raise versus limper to 5x, 7x, 10x, they 3-bet to 4x, 5x, 4-bet to 3x... this isn’t stealing or re-stealing, this is screaming value.Having studdied zoom a bit over the years i recommend u to play normal tables.
A zoom player with a high winrate is stealing and restealing a lot because people IN GENERAL are tighter in zoom games because they can just move on to the next hand. On higher zoom limits u will see a lot of blind resteals to button/cutoff opens and also 4 bet resteals. The top regs there will put endless pressure on others and they are not afraid to put their whole stack at risk. Plus they all play with a tracker. If u play zoom without a tracker u are on a big disadvantage, u basically play blind games against the ones with tracker.
At lower limits u can play a normal tag style and win some moderate bb's/hour. Players there are more tight and scared. (But its just...boring imo. because poker has also to do with gameflow, history and people who loose their patience and start to tilt. At zoom this all plays out very differently).
I personally have no idea how people can enjoy playing 4 tables micros zoom for hours and hours. Me i did not and nowadays the only zoom i play is when i get a welcome back bonus on chico lol.
I was not talking about zoom nl2 when i said the good regs are all using a tracker. My contribution was mainly not about the lowest zoom level. Hands oberved with very good, loose aggressive regs were mostly nl500. I played on different levels on fulltilt and later stars mostly micros untill i decided to not play zoom anymoreI’m not sure if most of players use a tracker, for the amount of mistakes they make preflop and postflop is preposterous: one top thing I’m observing is overbet. They raise versus limper to 5x, 7x, 10x, they 3-bet to 4x, 5x, 4-bet to 3x... this isn’t stealing or re-stealing, this is screaming value.
They 3-bet and you call, comes a dry flop and they bet 70-100% pot...
Yes, for beginners I would recommend regular tables but nothing wrong with Zoom.
Players are too much tight, which means our winrate will come from stealing blinds when SB x BB, or blinds 3-betting light versus BU and CO.
We are actually opening much more from EP, because players respect more raises coming from this position. No, I don’t think that there are too much regulars using trackers at NLHE 2.
There are tons of adventurers, broken stacked, recreational and curious players on Zoom.
We can easily open hands like 32s from UTG or 84o from BU having no further worries.
When we are in the blinds we can easily 3-bet having 76s, for example, and most of times they will fold.
When it comes in fold to the SB, we can open raise 99% of our range safely. They are way too tight, but they are passive, fit & fold style.
Players on Zoom are faced-up and straightforward when they use bet sizing: they tell the whole story by the sizing they elect to use.
Are they really any weaker than the regular 2NL tables though? Is your win rate any higher on zoom than regular, I'd be surprised if it is over a meaningful sample. I tend to agree with others that zoom is generally tougher than reg tables of the same stake.I’m not sure if most of players use a tracker, for the amount of mistakes they make preflop and postflop is preposterous: one top thing I’m observing is overbet. They raise versus limper to 5x, 7x, 10x, they 3-bet to 4x, 5x, 4-bet to 3x... this isn’t stealing or re-stealing, this is screaming value.
They 3-bet and you call, comes a dry flop and they bet 70-100% pot...
Yes, for beginners I would recommend regular tables but nothing wrong with Zoom.
Players are too much tight, which means our winrate will come from stealing blinds when SB x BB, or blinds 3-betting light versus BU and CO.
We are actually opening much more from EP, because players respect more raises coming from this position. No, I don’t think that there are too much regulars using trackers at NLHE 2.
There are tons of adventurers, broken stacked, recreational and curious players on Zoom.
We can easily open hands like 32s from UTG or 84o from BU having no further worries.
When we are in the blinds we can easily 3-bet having 76s, for example, and most of times they will fold.
When it comes in fold to the SB, we can open raise 99% of our range safely. They are way too tight, but they are passive, fit & fold style.
Players on Zoom are faced-up and straightforward when they use bet sizing: they tell the whole story by the sizing they elect to use.
Everything ok. I already answered ur pm.Sorry @Suns of Beaches I wasn’t mocking your comment but my own inability to beat these stakes as I wished. I’m having a real hard time to get out of a lower winrate playing NLHE 2 Zoom.
My winrate is coming from rakeback and it’s not more than 12/100 BB hour, which I believe is weaker than the average regulars of the field.
For what is worth, I’m being the actual fish now. 😂
Played 5 K hands at most, anyway, I’m returning and warming up.
Thanks for your patience and attention.
Not sure, calculating this by memory. I started with some amount and after 5 K hands I’m nearly 2 buy-ins down, however I’m not including the rakeback.Everything ok. I already answered ur pm.
Im not really an expert when it comes to cash games but 12bb/100 would be huge, u would crush these games.
Did u mean 1-2bb/100?
5k hands i think is not too much. Buddy of mine who is a winning reg on zoom nl25/nl50 just had a 25k hands breakeven stretch.
Hi mate, I would suggest going back to regular tables and then once you are comfortable with your win rate and bankroll move up to 5NL. It will be slower to move up playing zoom as the games are tougherSorry @Suns of Beaches I wasn’t mocking your comment but my own inability to beat these stakes as I wished. I’m having a real hard time to get out of a lower winrate playing NLHE 2 Zoom.
My winrate is coming from rakeback and it’s not more than 12/100 BB hour, which I believe is weaker than the average regulars of the field.
For what is worth, I’m being the actual fish now. 😂
Played 5 K hands at most, anyway, I’m returning and warming up.
Thanks for your patience and attention.