Same ranges in Zoom as in normal tables?

S

Station_Master

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Total posts
1,700
Awards
1
GB
Chips
765
I tend not to play zoom, but when I do I use the same ranges. In theory it's the same so just use standard GTO opening ranges. Of course if you want to play looser or tighter it's hard for your opponents to really pick up on this. I think many regs are just waiting for the nuts on zoom
 
Aballinamion

Aballinamion

Dark Lord of the Sith
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Total posts
2,605
Awards
3
BR
Chips
538
Hello, for those who play both modalities, do you use the same range of hands or so to speak the same tables to play?
Ranges will differ depending how much you know about your opponents. Most of times are unknown players, but if you constantly play Zoom you will notice fishes, then you can adapt your range.

Others have said and I partially agree with both of them: regulars are not always waiting for the nuts, some of the regulars do this and also some of the fishes: and this is how we exploit them because they will not hit the nuts so often, so we have more room for bluffing.
And yes, a major part of the regulars noticed this peculiarity and adapted to it, playing way more aggressive than we expect.
 
Paya_31

Paya_31

Visionary
Bronze Level
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Total posts
917
Awards
2
Chips
175
Hello, thanks to everyone who responded, I agree with you, it was clear to me the adaptation of the range according to the opponent, as well as what sometimes the regulars expect the nuts.
 
TeUnit

TeUnit

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Total posts
5,767
Awards
17
Chips
207
To me on zoom you are playing the "population ranges" and on normal tables you are playing the individual villans ranges.
 
23maxim88

23maxim88

Rock Star
Platinum Level
Joined
Sep 25, 2022
Total posts
362
Awards
3
UA
Chips
362
I play Texas Hold'em Zoom and Omaha regular tables.
 
Canaldo Kao

Canaldo Kao

Visionary
Bronze Level
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Total posts
782
Awards
1
BR
Chips
440
Hello, for those who play both modalities, do you use the same range of hands or so to speak the same tables to play?
I love playing Zoom, but I also have a good regularity at the regular tables!(y)
 
Sunz of Beaches

Sunz of Beaches

Whot a Donk
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Total posts
5,236
Awards
2
Chips
2,005
Having studdied zoom a bit over the years i recommend u to play normal tables.

A zoom player with a high winrate is stealing and restealing a lot because people IN GENERAL are tighter in zoom games because they can just move on to the next hand. On higher zoom limits u will see a lot of blind resteals to button/cutoff opens and also 4 bet resteals. The top regs there will put endless pressure on others and they are not afraid to put their whole stack at risk. Plus they all play with a tracker. If u play zoom without a tracker u are on a big disadvantage, u basically play blind games against the ones with tracker.

At lower limits u can play a normal tag style and win some moderate bb's/hour. Players there are more tight and scared. (But its just...boring imo. because poker has also to do with gameflow, history and people who loose their patience and start to tilt. At zoom this all plays out very differently).

I personally have no idea how people can enjoy playing 4 tables micros zoom for hours and hours. Me i did not and nowadays the only zoom i play is when i get a welcome back bonus on chico lol.
 
Last edited:
Sunz of Beaches

Sunz of Beaches

Whot a Donk
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Total posts
5,236
Awards
2
Chips
2,005
Something not ok @Aballinamion ?
Only shared my opinion/experience. Played and observed many hands there years ago 😉
 
sidd4rt4

sidd4rt4

Rock Star
Bronze Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2021
Total posts
155
Awards
1
EC
Chips
61
depending of the number of players in the table you can consider other option in your hand
 
Aballinamion

Aballinamion

Dark Lord of the Sith
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Total posts
2,605
Awards
3
BR
Chips
538
Having studdied zoom a bit over the years i recommend u to play normal tables.

A zoom player with a high winrate is stealing and restealing a lot because people IN GENERAL are tighter in zoom games because they can just move on to the next hand. On higher zoom limits u will see a lot of blind resteals to button/cutoff opens and also 4 bet resteals. The top regs there will put endless pressure on others and they are not afraid to put their whole stack at risk. Plus they all play with a tracker. If u play zoom without a tracker u are on a big disadvantage, u basically play blind games against the ones with tracker.

At lower limits u can play a normal tag style and win some moderate bb's/hour. Players there are more tight and scared. (But its just...boring imo. because poker has also to do with gameflow, history and people who loose their patience and start to tilt. At zoom this all plays out very differently).

I personally have no idea how people can enjoy playing 4 tables micros zoom for hours and hours. Me i did not and nowadays the only zoom i play is when i get a welcome back bonus on chico lol.
I’m not sure if most of players use a tracker, for the amount of mistakes they make preflop and postflop is preposterous: one top thing I’m observing is overbet. They raise versus limper to 5x, 7x, 10x, they 3-bet to 4x, 5x, 4-bet to 3x... this isn’t stealing or re-stealing, this is screaming value.
They 3-bet and you call, comes a dry flop and they bet 70-100% pot...
Yes, for beginners I would recommend regular tables but nothing wrong with Zoom.
Players are too much tight, which means our winrate will come from stealing blinds when SB x BB, or blinds 3-betting light versus BU and CO.
We are actually opening much more from EP, because players respect more raises coming from this position. No, I don’t think that there are too much regulars using trackers at NLHE 2.
There are tons of adventurers, broken stacked, recreational and curious players on Zoom.
We can easily open hands like 32s from UTG or 84o from BU having no further worries.
When we are in the blinds we can easily 3-bet having 76s, for example, and most of times they will fold.
When it comes in fold to the SB, we can open raise 99% of our range safely. They are way too tight, but they are passive, fit & fold style.
Players on Zoom are faced-up and straightforward when they use bet sizing: they tell the whole story by the sizing they elect to use.
 
Sunz of Beaches

Sunz of Beaches

Whot a Donk
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Total posts
5,236
Awards
2
Chips
2,005
I’m not sure if most of players use a tracker, for the amount of mistakes they make preflop and postflop is preposterous: one top thing I’m observing is overbet. They raise versus limper to 5x, 7x, 10x, they 3-bet to 4x, 5x, 4-bet to 3x... this isn’t stealing or re-stealing, this is screaming value.
They 3-bet and you call, comes a dry flop and they bet 70-100% pot...
Yes, for beginners I would recommend regular tables but nothing wrong with Zoom.
Players are too much tight, which means our winrate will come from stealing blinds when SB x BB, or blinds 3-betting light versus BU and CO.
We are actually opening much more from EP, because players respect more raises coming from this position. No, I don’t think that there are too much regulars using trackers at NLHE 2.
There are tons of adventurers, broken stacked, recreational and curious players on Zoom.
We can easily open hands like 32s from UTG or 84o from BU having no further worries.
When we are in the blinds we can easily 3-bet having 76s, for example, and most of times they will fold.
When it comes in fold to the SB, we can open raise 99% of our range safely. They are way too tight, but they are passive, fit & fold style.
Players on Zoom are faced-up and straightforward when they use bet sizing: they tell the whole story by the sizing they elect to use.
I was not talking about zoom nl2 when i said the good regs are all using a tracker. My contribution was mainly not about the lowest zoom level. Hands oberved with very good, loose aggressive regs were mostly nl500. I played on different levels on fulltilt and later stars mostly micros untill i decided to not play zoom anymore

Obv at Nl2 everyone has tons of leaks and in general the play is weak tight. What did u expect?

I dont play NL2 anymore. and if i would then definitely not in a nitty game like zoom to steal a few cents/hour.
 
Last edited:
S

Station_Master

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Total posts
1,700
Awards
1
GB
Chips
765
I’m not sure if most of players use a tracker, for the amount of mistakes they make preflop and postflop is preposterous: one top thing I’m observing is overbet. They raise versus limper to 5x, 7x, 10x, they 3-bet to 4x, 5x, 4-bet to 3x... this isn’t stealing or re-stealing, this is screaming value.
They 3-bet and you call, comes a dry flop and they bet 70-100% pot...
Yes, for beginners I would recommend regular tables but nothing wrong with Zoom.
Players are too much tight, which means our winrate will come from stealing blinds when SB x BB, or blinds 3-betting light versus BU and CO.
We are actually opening much more from EP, because players respect more raises coming from this position. No, I don’t think that there are too much regulars using trackers at NLHE 2.
There are tons of adventurers, broken stacked, recreational and curious players on Zoom.
We can easily open hands like 32s from UTG or 84o from BU having no further worries.
When we are in the blinds we can easily 3-bet having 76s, for example, and most of times they will fold.
When it comes in fold to the SB, we can open raise 99% of our range safely. They are way too tight, but they are passive, fit & fold style.
Players on Zoom are faced-up and straightforward when they use bet sizing: they tell the whole story by the sizing they elect to use.
Are they really any weaker than the regular 2NL tables though? Is your win rate any higher on zoom than regular, I'd be surprised if it is over a meaningful sample. I tend to agree with others that zoom is generally tougher than reg tables of the same stake.
 
Aballinamion

Aballinamion

Dark Lord of the Sith
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Total posts
2,605
Awards
3
BR
Chips
538
Sorry @Suns of Beaches I wasn’t mocking your comment but my own inability to beat these stakes as I wished. I’m having a real hard time to get out of a lower winrate playing NLHE 2 Zoom.
My winrate is coming from rakeback and it’s not more than 12/100 BB hour, which I believe is weaker than the average regulars of the field.
For what is worth, I’m being the actual fish now. 😂
Played 5 K hands at most, anyway, I’m returning and warming up.
Thanks for your patience and attention.
 
Sunz of Beaches

Sunz of Beaches

Whot a Donk
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Total posts
5,236
Awards
2
Chips
2,005
Sorry @Suns of Beaches I wasn’t mocking your comment but my own inability to beat these stakes as I wished. I’m having a real hard time to get out of a lower winrate playing NLHE 2 Zoom.
My winrate is coming from rakeback and it’s not more than 12/100 BB hour, which I believe is weaker than the average regulars of the field.
For what is worth, I’m being the actual fish now. 😂
Played 5 K hands at most, anyway, I’m returning and warming up.
Thanks for your patience and attention.
Everything ok. I already answered ur pm.

Im not really an expert when it comes to cash games but 12bb/100 would be huge, u would crush these games.

Did u mean 1-2bb/100?

5k hands i think is not too much. Buddy of mine who is a winning reg on zoom nl25/nl50 just had a 25k hands breakeven stretch.
 
Aballinamion

Aballinamion

Dark Lord of the Sith
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 4, 2017
Total posts
2,605
Awards
3
BR
Chips
538
No
Everything ok. I already answered ur pm.

Im not really an expert when it comes to cash games but 12bb/100 would be huge, u would crush these games.

Did u mean 1-2bb/100?

5k hands i think is not too much. Buddy of mine who is a winning reg on zoom nl25/nl50 just had a 25k hands breakeven stretch.
Not sure, calculating this by memory. I started with some amount and after 5 K hands I’m nearly 2 buy-ins down, however I’m not including the rakeback.
 
georgi krastev

georgi krastev

Legendary Donk-Fish
Bronze Level
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Total posts
4,355
Awards
4
BG
Chips
597
Hi, yes, the ranges are pretty much the same... (If i fold K7o at zoom, i also fold K7o at regular)
 
S

Station_Master

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
Oct 26, 2022
Total posts
1,700
Awards
1
GB
Chips
765
Sorry @Suns of Beaches I wasn’t mocking your comment but my own inability to beat these stakes as I wished. I’m having a real hard time to get out of a lower winrate playing NLHE 2 Zoom.
My winrate is coming from rakeback and it’s not more than 12/100 BB hour, which I believe is weaker than the average regulars of the field.
For what is worth, I’m being the actual fish now. 😂
Played 5 K hands at most, anyway, I’m returning and warming up.
Thanks for your patience and attention.
Hi mate, I would suggest going back to regular tables and then once you are comfortable with your win rate and bankroll move up to 5NL. It will be slower to move up playing zoom as the games are tougher
 
Top