Forum
CardsChat Freerolls
Best Online Poker Sites
US Online Poker
Delaware Online Poker
Michigan Online Poker
Nevada Online Poker
New Jersey Online Poker
Pennsylvania Online Poker
Canada Online Poker
UK Online Poker
Australia Online Poker
India Online Poker
Ireland Online Poker
New Zealand Online Poker
Best Freerolls
Best Poker Bonuses
Best Mobile Poker Sites & Poker Apps
Poker Site Reviews
888poker
Betfair
GGpoker
PartyPoker
PokerStars
Unibet
Poker
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Strategy & Rules
30 Day Poker School
Texas Hold'em Starting Hands
Poker Games
Odds for Dummies
10 Tips for Winning Online
How Much Money Can You Make Playing Poker?
How To Play Poker
Texas Hold'em
Omaha
Omaha Hi-Lo
Badugi
Open Faced Chinese
Video Poker
Poker Hands
Tools
Poker Hands Converter
Poker Odds Calculator
Organise a Home Game
Poker Glossary
Tournaments
WSOP
WSOP Winners
WSOP History
WSOP Events
WSOP News
European Poker Tour
Best Poker Players
Poker News
Podcast
Best Online Casinos
US Online Casinos
Connecticut Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
New Jersey Online Casinos
Pennsylvania Online Casinos
West Virginia Online Casinos
Canada Online Casinos
UK Online Casinos
Australia Online Casinos
India Online Casinos
Ireland Online Casinos
New Zealand Online Casinos
Real Money Casinos
Blackjack Online Casinos
Roulette Online Casinos
Baccarat Online Casinos
Best Mobile Casinos & Apps
Best Casino Bonuses
Best Payouts
No Deposit Casinos
Free Spins
Casino Site Reviews
Betway
Casumo
JackpotCity Casino
PokerStars Casino
Ruby Fortune
Spin Casino
Casino
Free Online Casino Games
Slots
Best Online Sites
How to Play Slots
Slots Software Reviews
Real Money Gambling
US Online Gambling
Canada Online Gambling
UK Online Gambling
Australia Online Gambling
New Zealand Online Gambling
India Online Gambling
Ireland Online Gambling
Casino News
Awards
Search forums
News
Poker News
Tournament News
Casino News
Legal
Scandals
Opinion
Podcast
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Expected Value article by FPaulsson
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="F Paulsson, post: 392656, member: 6979"] Back at the hotel, and I just thought I'd have a look at the semi-bluff, like the one listed above. I've changed the scenario somewhat, though. The semi-bluff is very widely used, and I suspect that it's overused. So here's the calculation (I'm doing this "blind," e.g. I don't know what these calculations will yield). The idea behind the semi-bluff is that we bet or raise with a drawing hand because we have two ways to win: By either making the other person(s) fold, or by catching our draw. The theory behind it is that the combined chances of these two events can make it an overall +EV play. So let's look at a common scenario and determine [B]how often our opponents need to fold to make a semi-bluff correct[/B]. All other aspects of this will be ignored, e.g. implied odds that are improved/worsened by us raising now. For simplicity's sake, we'll assume that if we just call, we'll be able to win 2BBs on the river (we have position, call now, and then raise on the river and get called if we hit), and if we raise, we'll only win 1 more BB on the river (1 person calls the raise on the turn, and check/call the river). Scenario: Three people to the flop and turn. It was raised preflop, one bet (from middle position) on flop which both other players call, and now the middle position player has bet again, just as you picked up a flush draw. You are on the button. Other assumptions: The first position player is very unlikely to call two bets cold on the turn - if we raise, we're pretty sure he will fold. Actually, let's say he folds anyway. How often does the bettor (MP) have to fold for this play to be +EV? There are now 6SB from preflop, 3SB from flop, and 1BB from turn in the pot = 5.5BB. The different scenarios: [B]You call[/B]. 20% of the time, you will spike your flush (and win 2 more bets on the river), 80% of the time you will lose 1BB. This gives you an expected value of 0.2*(7.5) + (-1)*0.8 = 1.5 - 0.8 = 0.7BB. [B]You raise. How often must villain fold for this to be better than 0.7BB?[/B] Let's say that he will call X percent of the time. It's clear, then, that the equation is this: (0.2*X)(7.5) + (0.8*X)(-2) + (1-X)(5.5) = 0.7 So we solve for X. 1.5X -1.6X + 5.5 - 5.5X = 0.7 -0.1X - 5.5X = 0.7 - 5.5 -5.6X = -4.8 X = 4.8 / 5.6 = 0.85 Uh. Okay, that actually surprised me. Apparently, for the turn semi-bluff raise to be a better move than to just call, we need to trust that the bettor will fold 85% of the time or more. I feel like my math is messed up somewhere, because this is higher than I expected. Then again, because of messed up airconditioning (read: no airconditioning) I was awake until 4am this morning and had breakfast at 7, so chances are I'm not thinking straight and that my calculations suck. If anyone wants to check my math, feel free - I'd like to know if it really is this bad to semi-bluff raise the turn. Cheers, Fredrik [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Expected Value article by FPaulsson
Top