Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Highsolation, post: 6310768, member: 442671"] I would like to discuss some things beforehand. First of all, blind vs blind situation has a wide ranges, so it's really hard to determine villain's by his raise. Maybe he has a hand or maybe he only wanted to steal your blind. Now, you said that your hand was neither super premium nor total trash, so at least for me, it would have made more sense to just call in this spot and see the flop. Remember, you have position against villain in this hand so it will be easier for you to maneuver post flop. So I don't like the 3-bet that you made, as you don't have information about the opponent whatsoever, I would much rather call and play in position post flop. So given that we are here in this awkward spot already... and given that villain 4-bet to 27BB, if you were to call here, pot would be 54BB, and you would have 73BB on your stack, SPR would be 1,35 which is a commitment situation, I would jam with QQ+, AK, given that microstakes people won't 4bet bluff often. If villain is not bluffing, I would put him on the exact range, QQ+ and AK. Any extra hand he has in his 4 bet range would improve your equity. About sizing, I'd say there's not much tells given +/- 0.5 BB, the important thing you need to consider is the SPR going into the flop, if the SPR is small, it's better to jam preflop as you'd be commited anyways. So I'd say it's not that complicated of a situation, you decided to 3-bet bluff and opponent showed even more strenght, so I would just fold here. If you call the 27BB you'd be in a even more awkward position post flop. I hope it made sense to you, if you have the hand history posted here it would be even better to analyze. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us