Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 6691160, member: 289533"]
When we truly observe bet sizing we can deduce a bunch of good stuff to us: villain whiffs its opening raise, which is out of the way (observation of strange sizing), Hero 3-bets and another cool observation, villain 4-bets to another uncommon sizing, almost 3x. 
We know that coming from weak players, they don’t know sizings to use for opening, 3-bet and 4-bet, and by this choice of volume we can put it right away into some strong range QQ+ AQs+. Unless villain is maniac/aggrotard, then we can hope for some 77-TT and weaker broadways and connectors.
Good that the flop comes good to us and villain bets a sizing that we cannot refuse, willing to extract maximum value with its AA, KK, QQ, AK and AQ. 
The turn is even better but we must have in mind that most of flops will not come like this one and turns specially, só how are we going to play JJ postflop in a 4-bet pot having a stack that doesn’t give us many maneuverability postflop? 
On top of that, it’s hard for anyone to fold a 4-bet pot, having 100 BB or a bit more. We put 20% of our stack preflop and most likely 30% OTF or OTT, which commit us to the pot not giving room to many bluffs, ergo we are going all-in most of times postflop. 
One important matter is about rake. How much % are we paying per pot? Do we play rake preflop? If we don’t play rake preflop and let’s suppose the rake is equal to the PokerStars’ NLHE 100, we can 5-bet shove with no further worries.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language