Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="zebranky, post: 472376, member: 14994"] I guess the longstanding problem I have with your tactics (and continual citation of WAWB) is that it always seems to suggest calling down rather than aggressive play. You never seem to want to add value to the pot, except by maybe tricking your opponent into bluffing into you, and therefore putting yourself on the spot instead of the opponent. There are plenty of hands I would bet into that flop - obviously, you would say I'm incorrect to do so with everyone of them. Bottom line, I'll bet if I think I have the best hand, or if I think I can represent a hand better than the one my opponent is holding. That is the foundation of betting vs checking for me, and after that it comes down to math and guts. I'll certainly check out your post in Stategy, but if it is the same interpretation of that method that you've been proposing on the various HA threads, I really think its wrong 90% of the time. [/QUOTE]