Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 7169434, member: 397965"] Preflop Seems like a fine spot to 3-bet. Maybe you can go a bit larger, since you are out of position against MP. Flop Obviously a fine spot to C-bet for value. Maybe you can go a bit smaller, especially since the SPR (Stack to Pot Ratio) is just a bit over 2. Which by the way also mean, that this is a spot, where you are never even considering to fold TPTK, unless the board runs out really bad like 4 cards to a straight or flush. Turn Pot is $480, and you only have $300 left behind. If he had checked to you, then surely you would have jammed for value? So why change your mind, just because SB did it for you? There is hardly ever a situation in poker, where its correct to bet for value and then change your mind and fold to a single bet, when nothing has changed other than the bet itself. At least not when we are talking normal bet sizes like less than pot. I will admit, that it does not make much sense for SB to have a bluff here. But it also does not make any sense for him to have a hand, that beat you, and play it this way. TT should have folded the flop, at least when MP had already called. 66, 44 and QT should have folded preflop, and Q6, Q4 even more so. QQ+ should have 3-bet himself or backraised, if he played them as a slowplay. And if he did dubble flat pre with anything, that beat you on the flop, he should either have check-jammed the flop or checked again on the turn. So nothing makes sense here other than maybe 1-2 combos of QTs, you were (hopefully?) planning to jam yourself if checked to, and you already labeled MP as a fish, so there is no reason to worry to much about him having a hand, that beat you. And finally you are getting better than 2:1, and you only need to win around 28% and even less, if MP also call. Easy call. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language