Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="NineLions, post: 471017, member: 13483"]
Thanks for the replies, guys. I was thinking I was being too aggressive. Also, the 77 never crossed my mind, and it should have, so thanks for pointing that out.

Of course, part of the reason I was questioning my play is because I lost. Here's how it played out:

Ninelions: raises $3 to $8
eminem1217: raises $1.40 to $9.40 and is all-in
Ninelions: calls $1.40
*** TURN *** [Ks Kc 7s] [Qs]
*** RIVER *** [Ks Kc 7s Qs] [2h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
eminem1217: shows [Qc Kd] (a full house, Kings full of Queens)
Ninelions: mucks hand 
eminem1217 collected $20.75 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $21.80 | Rake $1.05 
Board [Ks Kc 7s Qs 2h]
Seat 1: Mike4314 (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: HurricaneIvo folded on the Flop
Seat 3: herkum folded on the Flop
Seat 4: Reaper75 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Ninelions mucked [As Kh]
Seat 7: itwassoooted (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: eminem1217 (small blind) showed [Qc Kd] and won ($20.75) with a full house, Kings full of Queens

He hit one of 3 outs to get the Q, but I could have hit another spade on the river as well, or an ace since it turned out he didn't have AA. Even with a results oriented perspective, I'm thinking this is one of those hands that I was destined to go broke with.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us