Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="robwhufc, post: 387624, member: 4289"]
:o I'm not being deliberately antagonistic, honest i'm not, but i'm switching too! The last one was a definate call (or raise, it was pretty much the same thing) in my opinion - his opponents most likely holding was a pair of jacks and JL had Kings. Also he had v.good pot odds, a small liability ($19) and was in the BB disguising the strength of his hand.
 
Here, like TB i'd narrow his opponents cards down to just AK and AQ. You're beat (or at least well behind) with AQ, pot odds are low, and your liability is much greater ($56.85). I'd call - he's made it cheap for you to stay in the hand and see what he does next, I dont think he'll fold to an all-in, so by calling you're giving yourself an extra opportunity to get out if you really dont like the look of the board.
 
And I dont agree with Juicee really (sorry!). That small bet looks like a trap to me (that's certainly how i'd play AQ here).
 
I dont care if this goes against what everyone else says (!), but if you're going all-in anyway, why not see an extra card and get a bit better feel for the hand? The all-in move is only better if you think opponent is going to fold, and his re-raising into an A flop surely suggests he wont.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language