Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
How not to play a set
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Jesus Lederer, post: 412049, member: 3283"] I like a 3/4 pot size bet here, but i would never check a flop like that unless the guy who´s going to act next is extremely aggressive and i´m sure he´s going to bet. In that case i prefer the check, because i can trap one or two callers who are going to add money into the pot, making it more tempting to the original bettor when it´s my turn and i raise heavily. But aside that particular situation, by checking this flop you aren´t going to achieve anything except maybe an induced bluff on the turn, but what you win by that induced bluff is nothing compared to what you are going to lose if you let someone hit his draw (which was very possible considering that it was 6 handed, the preflop action and especially the texture of the flop, which had a high straight draw, a low one and a a flush draw). Checking a hand like a hidden set seems great to extract a lot of chips on later streets, making your opponent think that you didn´t get a piece of the flop and you´re betting with middle pair, top pair/weak kicker or a turn hit, but you can do that only when the texture of the flop is inoffensive and there´s no big possibility of someone drawing. Also if you start to analyze what´s the real thing you´re trying to achieve when you decide to check, you´ll find that there isn´t any good reason to do it. Many people say "i´m letting someone hit anything on the turn, and that combined with the hidden strength of my hand, means a lot of chips to be extracted on the turn and river". That´s a good argument when the flop has no texture, but when it has, what possible card on the turn could your opponent hit that makes his hand good enough to commit chips but weak enough to be beaten by you? The answer is almost none. So by checking in a flop with texture you achieve nothing and risk a lot. I´m glad both opponents hit and you lost the hand, so you could realize of your mistake. I think you´re being results oriented. As dogs said, with a set you don´t want to scare everyone out. You´re killing the implied odds you have with a low pocket pair if you take the pot right on the flop (you can do that anytime with a simple continuation bet if you don´t hit). The low and middle pocket pairs work based on implied odds, you want to be paid by players chasing something and especially holding high pocket pairs or TPTK. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
How not to play a set
Top