Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Four Dogs, post: 364359, member: 2668"]
For the most part I avoid reading the Hand Anaysis threads. Not because I don't enjoy it, but because there's rarely anything to analyse. Self glorification, maniacal bad beats, same ol' same ol'. The one exception I make is your's XD. Why? They confuse me. They make me think I that maybe I just don't get it. Here's the MO. XD gets dealt monster hole cards. He over bets the pot. Maniac calls. He overbets the flop, Maniac calls, He overbets the turn, Maniac calls. He overbets the river, Maniac goes all-in, XD calls. Maniac wins with trip 3's he picked up on the river or in this case a flush.

Then the fun begins. His loyal fans all chime in on how big a maniac Maniac was and that this sort of thing happens. "That's Poker!".

I on the other hand keep wondering why nobody else is wondering if XD ever wonders if it's possible that Maniac may actually have a hand better than a pair of Kings. The fact that Maniac made his hand on the river is irrellavant. 
I just don't get it. I just would never take a pair of kings this far. Am I a chump?:confused:
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us