Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6997019, member: 397965"] On a non diamond turn we get calls from top pair. And on any turn we dont mind it, if Villain fold out their draws for a less than pot sized bet, since we achieve a lot of equity denial for a reasonable price. Admittedly this is a little bit more of a tournament mindset, but I am mainly a tournament player, so I cant help it :) Sure but then you should not check back the turn. In a standard 3-bet pot UTG vs. BTN with no caller in between GTO Wizard does bet small on this flop with most of its range including TT. But it never check back TT on the turn, so this is a much larger deviation from GTO play, than a large flop bet would be. And do you really need to play GTO in the first place in a live game against someone, who is "pretty loose"? If not then its allowed to have different sizings in a situation, where solvers mostly "range bet". If the opponents are recreational, they are not going to pick up on that. With essentially the nuts we should not be looking to induce but strictly to bet for value. And especially so if we are going to fold, when we actually get the bluff, we were trying to induce. Admittedly this was one of the worst runouts for your hand, so its not always going to end like this. But still the idea of betting small with the nuts "to induce" is flawed in my opinion. As I already said, checking back the turn was the main mistake, when you take this sizing on the flop. Its not even possible to check, what the solver would do with TT on the river, because it never check back turn with that hand. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us