Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 6743684, member: 289533"] Okay, villain has a broken stack and the sizing gives odds for a call: but we must keep in mind throughout the whole streets that there’s a great chance that villain is a recreational one. This is a nice move because only us have all the nutted flushes. But a bad idea considering that villain is a potential recreational player and might call with top pairs, two pairs, sets or lower flushes. Our plan here is to jam any river in spite if it is a diamonds or not. I think that overall you are not considering what a recreational player is: a player that has little idea about anything and hardly can be bluffed. So when we jam river we are praying for villain not to call with a Qx or any other hand that shouldn’t be calling. When villain raises our donk OTT this is a red flag and a burning sign: recreational players are too passive and clicking buttons when they think they own a strong hand, i.e, villain shouldn’t be raising this turn with any hands because it doesn’t own the nuts (we own it holding the ace of diamonds), so what the hell are we re-raising here? Yes, I know we have some equity for the river but when it completes a fourth diamonds are we going to get paid? 70-80% of times we are missing this draw so what’s our plan exactly? Ergo, if we shoved river and villain called with Qx or a dominated flush, we cannot complain because we are applying a level of thought that villain could never reach: if villain was decent it wouldn’t min-raise, it wouldn’t be broken stack, it wouldn’t check flop and raise turn with whatever it has. So why the hell are we trying to bluff this guy when it is not in the same level (metathinking) as we are? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language