Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="eetenor, post: 6817998, member: 385063"] Your observations are good and show the interaction differences we face when playing non GTO players- GTO does show 4 bets in spots when Villains normally flat- that causes us to have to adapt our post flop play because they have cards that we wanted to fold out when we were bottom of range or have them raise and let us fold so we do not face reverse implied odds spots. If we were to node lock V having over pairs calling in this spot GTO might have us call A9s pre not raise it for instance. As in your hand GTO V does not have a lot of TX but V we play will often have twice as many Tx hand combos or more than GTO does- The difference in solutions calling vs raising IP occurs based on GTO V range expectations not standard V play -this is where we have to decide which line works best for our games if we are IP and what are V are doing when they are IP. Therefore when we find a solution that mirrors our V action like calling more IP we want to follow that solver decision tree to study how we interact with it. The bet sizing difference is based on frequency of betting in this instance not on nut advantage- When we bet less of our range that is when GTO uses larger sizing as we are polar to the nuts or bluffs we do not bet middle of our range. That is why the solver has you bet large and fold in the hand that you played- If you were to bet small you would then call most frequently but the reverse implied odds of improving vs V's GTO raising range reduce our expected EV when we do that. That is why we bet bigger to get more folds and fewer raises and to set up our jams on flop when raised. We are lowering the SPR to make our jams look natural not forced. The first point here in the hand that you played is the bet sizing- often bigger bets work well vs our V to get the above results from nonGTO ranges as well That is why the play is to fold or Jam in that spot when raised not call- the solver expects the V to call most of their range on flop not raise because most of your betting range is fold or jam and it expects the V to know this. Most of our V do not know this and that is where we have to deviate from solver play by changing our action frequency not our bet sizing It takes a while to be able to adapt to GTO strategies but it is a great way to think deeply about the why of our actions. :unsure::geek: [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language