Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$200 NLHE Full Ring: Top two calling down triple barrel or naw?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="eetenor, post: 5918655, member: 385063"] Thank U 4 Posting So why not 3 bet the 89s? Does this Villain 4 bet often? Is the V a calling station so you knew you could not get them to fold a pair post flop? Was the table so tight you knew you would not go multiway with what might be a dominated flush draw? So why not raise the flop? Why not try to build a pot and protect a vulnerable 2 pair? Were you trapping? If so why are we not all in on the turn? When the V bets into the straight card on the turn V has 215 -7-17-51=140 U call pot is 153 you shove for 140 more they are getting 2-1 to call so folds are not a certainty here and if they do fold over pairs like QQ we are fine they still have 18% on the turn. This V bet pot every street so folding the river is not obvious here. Players that bet like this on that turn can think AA is the nuts on the river. They also can have AKc AQc and shove river. So we have to ask why pot every street? If they had a set why pot the flop and the turn putting max pressure on most of your range? If they had the draw on the flop-JT- pot bet is possible but why pot the turn when pot size bets get more folds and they just made the nuts? If we know our V well we can trap for stacks with 2 pair here which means we are never folding the river. If we do not know our V really well we want to take action on the flop so we know where we are in the hand and to control the pot size if we get a sick runout like A K Q J on turn which could give our V sets. Hope this helps :):) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$200 NLHE Full Ring: Top two calling down triple barrel or naw?
Top