Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 5544845, member: 393841"]
Ok aggressive game, it looks good. In preflop you raised above the standard. Now your range has a lot of non-blocking combinations and could potentially help in the post flop to represent a good hand, thus turning a low hand into a really dangerous range and generating interesting fold equity. The thing that I observe is that you choose very well the tables that you participate. This has the advantage that decisions are simpler when you find yourself in critical places. But the downside is that possibly against sticky villains you have less chance of beating top pairs for example as we don't expect weak kickers to give up in these cases.
So from this I infer that a size at 4x or 4.5x works best in preflop against these villains. But beyond that size, you really are exposing yourself many times to catchy calls that will follow you to the end.
On the flop your raise was a bit excessive, but we really do have the top of our range, so the size you chose can fit very well in micro stakes.
On the turn, your push was too aggressive. Your polarized range could represent a lost draw, now you are dominated in TPTK combos or even medium pockets that could trap you in this place. When covering villains in stacks, a smaller overbet is proportionally more elegant, in order to represent the same range of aggression. Hopefully you get the same call frequency, but your move could be more exploitative for the long haul.
Greetings.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us