Forum
CardsChat Freerolls
Best Online Poker Sites
US Online Poker
Delaware Online Poker
Michigan Online Poker
Nevada Online Poker
New Jersey Online Poker
Pennsylvania Online Poker
Canada Online Poker
UK Online Poker
Australia Online Poker
India Online Poker
Ireland Online Poker
New Zealand Online Poker
Best Freerolls
Best Poker Bonuses
Best Mobile Poker Sites & Poker Apps
Poker Site Reviews
888poker
Betfair
GGpoker
PartyPoker
PokerStars
Unibet
Poker
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Strategy & Rules
30 Day Poker School
Texas Hold'em Starting Hands
Poker Games
Odds for Dummies
10 Tips for Winning Online
How Much Money Can You Make Playing Poker?
How To Play Poker
Texas Hold'em
Omaha
Omaha Hi-Lo
Badugi
Open Faced Chinese
Video Poker
Poker Hands
Tools
Poker Hands Converter
Poker Odds Calculator
Organise a Home Game
Poker Glossary
Tournaments
WSOP
WSOP Winners
WSOP History
WSOP Events
WSOP News
European Poker Tour
Best Poker Players
Poker News
Podcast
Best Online Casinos
US Online Casinos
Connecticut Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
New Jersey Online Casinos
Pennsylvania Online Casinos
West Virginia Online Casinos
Canada Online Casinos
UK Online Casinos
Australia Online Casinos
India Online Casinos
Ireland Online Casinos
New Zealand Online Casinos
Real Money Casinos
Blackjack Online Casinos
Roulette Online Casinos
Baccarat Online Casinos
Best Mobile Casinos & Apps
Best Casino Bonuses
Best Payouts
No Deposit Casinos
Free Spins
Casino Site Reviews
Betway
Casumo
JackpotCity Casino
PokerStars Casino
Ruby Fortune
Spin Casino
Casino
Free Online Casino Games
Slots
Best Online Sites
How to Play Slots
Slots Software Reviews
Real Money Gambling
US Online Gambling
Canada Online Gambling
UK Online Gambling
Australia Online Gambling
New Zealand Online Gambling
India Online Gambling
Ireland Online Gambling
Casino News
Awards
Search forums
News
Poker News
Tournament News
Casino News
Legal
Scandals
Opinion
Podcast
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$2 NLHE Full Ring: QQ in Hijack Played too strong?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="300HPGOD, post: 6106259, member: 305911"] I'll start that I am unfamiliar with how bomb pots work so if Im missing something from that maybe it changes how I would play but I'll give my opinion as if it were a regular table. I think you should be 4 betting pre there since calling is going to do what it did and that is attract a lot of players to be in the pot. I would be almost certain that UTG +1 is calling if we call due to price and on top of that others behind would probably know that as well and try to get a price. My opinion on this might change if I knew something about hi jack villain but I am not sure that we do or not so I like 4 betting here and more than likely getting the hand heads up with hi jack in position with a hand we like. The flop is weird because UTG+1 donk leads for 3/4ths pot but in this scenario I would be very happy they did so. To me, they are never doing this with JJ or 1010 since why would they try to get a fold with a set (with you I also doubt KK+)? Possibly they think hijack or you have QQ+ and are never folding but why wouldnt they just wait for that player to bet and then either call or check raise? My thinking is they specifically have AJ here and possibly KJ (which is loose but possible) and try to lead to take it down now. I also like that they did this because if my read is right then we have a built in set blocker to the J. The button is who I would be more worried about as JJ or 1010 is possible for them and a hand like 98 is possible (we block KQ so I discount that). In thinking that I am way ahead of UTG+1 and a little less worried about a set or KK+ from button I would just call here as you did and plan to get it all in on the turn one way or another. The turn is a bad card in a sense because 98 suited is a hand I think button could call behind with. I wouldnt be worried about it enough though to alter from my plan on the flop which was to get it in here. If my math is right we have about $1.40 left and pot is over $2 so I believe your jam is correct. If they have nothing and fold then you werent getting anymore anyway. UTG+1 with their check is either giving up or checking with the nuts which I doubt they have 98 so if they have a strong hand they would have had it on the flop as well and that lead makes no sense with super strong hand. All in all, besides 4 betting pre I think you played this hand well and did what I would have done post flop. To me, we are not checking that turn and what bet size could we make that makes sense? Betting even 1/3rd pot there is half your stack so you might as well get it in there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$2 NLHE Full Ring: QQ in Hijack Played too strong?
Top