Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$2 NLHE 6-max: Interesting 4-bet hand
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 5700007, member: 289533"] Phew..with that ammount of stacks involved this is very brave. 1) Co 3-bets UTG for a polarized sizing (3-bet to 4x). 2) We do 4-bet to 2.5x versus CO 3-bet, which could be fine if CO's 3-bet wasn't polarized. Now the pot is bigger than usual and we are 'deep stack'. 3) Continuing the polarization we bet a little bit more than 1/3 pot for a flop that isn't that scary at all: The only hands that have us beat right now are JJ and KJ, and many players are folding KJ to a 4-bet like that. Villain cannot display 44 here, J4, K4, we are blocking the one liner straight nuts, and there is no flush draws. Add to this situation that Villain can never show AA, KK, and AK in this scenario, we are removing these combos and if Villain really had AA and KK it would not be flatting preflop, no one is doing it. 4) OTT, we should be checking more often than betting, au contraire of other hands where we are only 100 blinds deep, in this hand we are 200 blinds deep and we already put a lot of chips into the table. Yes, we are scared of the flush of spades but there is only 18% chance to get it on the river, and when we go by checking our TPTK to the river, we can leave it in the case Villain gives too many action for the hand. It is very dangerous to be betting on this turn without nutted hands. If Villain comes over the top we have to call with TPTK, knowing our chances to be winning are minimal. 5) OTR the situation gets nasty. I don't know if I am calling down this bet, but you did, well played. We know that the whole scenario is telling us that Villain doesn't have hands that beat us, but this is 2 NLHE and we are risking 400 blinds pot + rake to see that finally, indeed, Villain pushed its busted draws OTR. Good example of why we should avoid bluffing at the micros: Hero/BTN should be folding in a decent frequency hands like TPTK and Two Pair, and calling down only with Sets and Straights. But we see that people don't believe in bluffs, it is a myth, but Villain played fine as well. Regards; Carlos 'Aballinamion' Barbosa [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$2 NLHE 6-max: Interesting 4-bet hand
Top