Forum
CardsChat Freerolls
Best Online Poker Sites
US Online Poker
Delaware Online Poker
Michigan Online Poker
Nevada Online Poker
New Jersey Online Poker
Pennsylvania Online Poker
Canada Online Poker
UK Online Poker
Australia Online Poker
India Online Poker
Ireland Online Poker
New Zealand Online Poker
Best Freerolls
Best Poker Bonuses
Best Mobile Poker Sites & Poker Apps
Poker Site Reviews
888poker
Betfair
GGpoker
PartyPoker
PokerStars
Unibet
Poker
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Strategy & Rules
30 Day Poker School
Texas Hold'em Starting Hands
Poker Games
Odds for Dummies
10 Tips for Winning Online
How Much Money Can You Make Playing Poker?
How To Play Poker
Texas Hold'em
Omaha
Omaha Hi-Lo
Badugi
Open Faced Chinese
Video Poker
Poker Hands
Tools
Poker Hands Converter
Poker Odds Calculator
Organise a Home Game
Poker Glossary
Tournaments
WSOP
WSOP Winners
WSOP History
WSOP Events
WSOP News
European Poker Tour
Best Poker Players
Poker News
Podcast
Best Online Casinos
US Online Casinos
Connecticut Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
New Jersey Online Casinos
Pennsylvania Online Casinos
West Virginia Online Casinos
Canada Online Casinos
UK Online Casinos
Australia Online Casinos
India Online Casinos
Ireland Online Casinos
New Zealand Online Casinos
Real Money Casinos
Blackjack Online Casinos
Roulette Online Casinos
Baccarat Online Casinos
Best Mobile Casinos & Apps
Best Casino Bonuses
Best Payouts
No Deposit Casinos
Free Spins
Casino Site Reviews
Betway
Casumo
JackpotCity Casino
PokerStars Casino
Ruby Fortune
Spin Casino
Casino
Free Online Casino Games
Slots
Best Online Sites
How to Play Slots
Slots Software Reviews
Real Money Gambling
US Online Gambling
Canada Online Gambling
UK Online Gambling
Australia Online Gambling
New Zealand Online Gambling
India Online Gambling
Ireland Online Gambling
Casino News
Awards
Search forums
News
Poker News
Tournament News
Casino News
Legal
Scandals
Opinion
Podcast
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$2 NL HE 6-max: !!!Could you find a fold?????maybe in a bigger game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="300HPGOD, post: 6502745, member: 305911"] Pre flop: How often is villain opening and how do we think they will react to our 3 bet should we make one? That is what I would be asking myself here with AQ off on the BB 6 handed (which full disclosure I do not play much at all). If this villain opens with any normal frequency for handed or more often and we think they will continue a lot then I think we should be 3 betting pre for value here. There are plenty of worse Ax that will continue against us and we make more in the long run by raising here imo. If the villain was nitty or even just nitty for 6 handed then I think calling is okay but mostly believe 3 betting overall here is better than calling. Flop: Without 3 betting here you have to check to the raiser and when they check behind thats fine since they could easily be checking behind almost their entire range here except JJ,1010,99 type hands. Those hands prob bet for a protection aspect so when they check I think its good for us. More likely they could have air like a K10 type hand but also more likely they have Ax when they check here then if they bet. Would be more interesting discussion for this street if you had 3 bet pre on this hand in regards to betting small vs checking flop. With your stack size in that scenario after 3 betting I would lean towards checking there as well. Just throwing that out there in case anyone is wondering. Turn: Turn is interesting due to it being a second spade. We do have the ace of spades which is huge here so we would think we are up against less flush draws than normal. However, I am not sure I would want to check again here with the two spades on the board plus I want to build a pot. With the two spades more hands will call us here if we do bet since villain could have two spades and is then not going anywhere and just maybe they see the card and are planning some bluff attempt (which would not be a good idea but maybe villain doesnt think that way). I would lean towards leading here as I want to build a pot and if villain has nothing then we are not likely getting anything anyway rest of the hand so might as well try to get a little something here. I would bet something like 7 cents here and hope for a call. You checked and got the result that was wanted which was a bet by villain. Raising here is mandatory although your raise should have been so much bigger for two reasons. One is we want value and two is villain is polarized here due to two aces on the board and we have one so they either have nothing here and are folding to any raise sizing or they have the last ace (or stronger which would be very bad of course for us but not something I would worry about) and are calling or re raising any size raise we make it. Therefore if they are in a strict binary decision and we are strong then we should go big here and milk them for all we can milk them. There is only three Ax beating us and all other Ax is not going anywhere. I like raising here to at least 32 cents here which would leave us 84 cents with 77 cents in the middle which is close enough to a pot sized jam on the river. With your min raise there even if villain had KK they are likely folding. River: I would think with villain calling our turn raise, even though it was small, that they have Ax a lot of the time. I would advocate going for it all here and just jamming even though it 2x pot or so. Villain could perceive it as a bluff but more likely they have A10 or AJ which for many players at these stakes will not be a fold or even a consideration of a fold. As played we bet basically pot and get jammed. I would feel AJ, A10, maybe even all Ax might play this way so I would never be folding here and would almost but not quite snap call. Also consider what we have in the pot compared to what we have left and there is no way you should be folding here imo. Like I said this is almost a snap call for me and I realize we could be beat here but there are more than enough Ax here that could play this way and with how deep we are that I am never folding this river. This is a tough luck hand that I can almost guarantee that if it was a 10 on the river instead of a 9 that villain would have done the same thing but they at least would have called and you would have won a nice pot. Bad luck on what turned out to be a bad river. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$2 NL HE 6-max: !!!Could you find a fold?????maybe in a bigger game
Top