Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="fundiver199, post: 6158484, member: 397965"]
Just one more quick addition. Hero said already, he had limited information on Villain, but if we do have information, ideally from HUD-stats, then this is a situation, where they would really matter. If the opponent is on the LAG or even maniac side of the spectrum with numbers like VPIP 28 / PFR 24 or maybe something even higher than that playing 4-handed, then I did the range analysis already.

This will often be a player, who have graduated from 2NL and 5NL and in the process learned, that draws can be played aggressively. But he have not yet learned the importance of balance, or it does not really matter at 10NL, because most opponents are not smart enough to figure it out, when he is overbluffing.

However if the opponent is on the more passive and fishy side of the spectrum with numbers like VPIP 42 / PFR 5, then its much more likely, he made a bad call pre with some ridiculous hand and sucked out on us by binking two pair on the turn. Like maybe T2 is his favourite hand, because its the "Doyle Brunson". Or he is playing 72 for LOLs, because he has seen the 72 game on TV poker.

Its also more likely, that he would check-call rather than check-raise his draws. So against that kind of opponent we are back to the Baluga theorem, where maybe we are not folding the turn getting such a great price, but we are not raising either, and we might lean more towards folding on the river, unless we improve.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language