Real Money Casinos
Fastest Payout Casinos
Mobile Casino Apps
New Online Casinos
Casino Payment Methods
Sweepstakes
Sweepstakes apps
No deposit bonus
Daily login bonus
Sweepstakes games
Crown Coins
Funrize
Hello Millions
High 5 Casino
Jackpota Casino
Mcluck
MegaBonanza
PlayFame
Pulsz
RealPrize
Stake.us
Sweepstakes coins
Awards
Search forums
Free Games
Free Blackjack
Free Online Roulette
Free Slots
US States
NJ Online Casinos
WV Online Casinos
PA Online Casinos
Michigan Online Casinos
Online Casino California
Online Casino Arizona
Online Casino NY
Bonuses
No Deposit Bonus
Crown Coins Promo Code
Funrize Primo Code
Hello Millions Promo Code
High 5 Casino Promo Code
Jackpota Promo Code
McLuck Promo Code
MegaBonanza Promo Code
Pulsz Promo Code
RealPrize Promo Code
Stake.us Promo Code
Games
Online Slots
Blackjack
Roulette
Poker
CardsChat Freerolls
How to Play Poker
Poker Hands
Poker Strategy
Free Online Poker Game
Poker Bonuses
Poker Tools
Poker Podcast
Poker School
Forum
News
Log in
Join
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Install the app
Install
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$10 NLHE 6-max: QQ facing aggression preflop, thoughts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="c0rnBr34d, post: 6166573, member: 394557"] My initial instinct was to fold when reading the OP but after thinking about it and reading the comments I think this is definitely a call based on stack sizes. Particularly the 55 BB side pot against a wide SB. Here is my super simplified EV calculation. I'm giving BTN, QQ+, AK and SB AQ+, TT+ but from the description he could easily be wider than this. Also given the SB dynamic it should make BTN more likely to stack off with AK as our ISO range may be perceived as wider than QQ+, AK here given the BTN open and maniac 3B. But for arguments sake I'm going with these conservative ranges and expecting our real EV to be higher. If we call: Main pot will be 153 BB + our call and against those ranges we have 28.73%. So our EV should be: (153 BB *28.73% win) - (42 BB call * 71.27% lose) (44 BB) - (30 BB) = +14 BB !!!! This ignores ties since it's a bit complicated 3 ways but the tie % is less than 3% Side pot will be 27.5 BB + our call and against SB we have at least 54.54%. (27.5 BB * 51.04% win) - (27.5 BB * 45.46% lose) (14 BB) - (12.5 BB) = +1.5 BB This accounts for the 3.5% of the time we tie and chop the side pot for +0 BB. The top of SBs range is also blocked by BTN so it should bias it a bit in our favor. It really comes down to if BTN can have AK or not. If SB can have AK then it's a definite call. And with one orbit and no reads against a maniac SB and an unknown ISO 4B I'd error on the side of including it until I have better reads. If we were risking our stack against solid players for a +2 to +5 BB EV then I could see not getting on the variance train and electing to fold sometimes but if we are passing up +15 BB spots I think we are probably making a mistake or do not have a large enough bank roll for the stakes. The worst case scenario as fundiver suggests if we give SB only QQ+ then our equity in the main pot plummets to 15.34% and our EV in the main pot falls to something like -12 BB. Then we need SB to be really wide to make back as much as possible of that on the side pot. For example if SB has AJ+, 99+ now we are making 6 BB in the side pot to offset and if he has AJ+, 66+ then we are already close to breaking even on the worst case scenario as we will make back close to the 12 BB on the side pot. Some of the maniac SB players here will call with 22 or A8s or worse in which case your QQ will be printing money in the side pot to cover even the worst case in the main. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Poker Strategy
Cash Games
Cash Game Hand Analysis
$10 NLHE 6-max: QQ facing aggression preflop, thoughts?
Top