Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hermus, post: 6205531, member: 346197"] It's kinda personal preference. Some people include all suited connectors as low as 76s as a late position 3-bet for their baseline strategy, but almost never at a 100% frequency. The reason why you would want to do that against other regs is board coverage, but 3-betting them all the time gets a bit too crazy. If CO opens too wide for whatever reason all suited connectors make great 3-bet bluff candidates and 3-betting them pure as an exploit is probably best. Your range hits the board fairly well, but also not amazingly well. I don't think you have a range bet here but you're still betting the majority of the time. Considering the SPR is pretty low and you're supposed to bet quite a lot, sizing down a bit is probably best. Checking is out of the question because 76s is for sure your best bluff combo because it has literally 0 showdown value if you miss and still has a lot of equity behind. Picking up the pair is super awkward. You're definitely not ahead against the value part of villain's continuing range though. However, given you picked up some showdown value, AXs with the flush draw are probably better bluff candidates and I think you're slightly overbluffing by also including 7h6h. Unless you think this is a value bet in which case I think that's also a bad idea. I like check/calling facing any reasonable sizing best. As played, I really don't know. You have a bluff catcher, but you don't block any of villain's value range. Might be the OESD is strong enough to make the call, but against an overall value skewed raising range that most of the population plays I guess folding is also fine. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language