Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Aballinamion, post: 6620416, member: 289533"]
Thanks for your reply mate, I feel myself honored when you react to any of my posts. You are a poker model that I try to follow. 
Now, I was trying to provoke our dear professor Anhalt, I like him very much and his book (Polished Poker Vol I had taught me a lot of good things and gave me such good insights). 😄 
I also would like to revive the thread Polished Poker, but it seems professor Anhalt had gave up upon working on it, and many players aren’t interested in the thread anymore. Which is sad.

Well, one thing we all have agreed: he should’ve folded preflop. IMO, either he folds or he 3-bets, although UTG is a NIT player, having a suited ace as a blocker give us playability in the case villain calls. 
There are hands there I never call in a situation like this, they are AA and KK, and the same goes for my bluffing range, the baby suited aces. 
It’s possible that villain could’ve check-raised the pot having any Kx, but villain also could’ve thought that his Kx could be dominated for AK, KQ, of UTG’s range. I’m not sure if villain would’ve raised the flop owning K6s-K9s.
You are right, villain shouldn’t have jammed the river owning any 5x, but as professor Anhalt said, this is the micro stakes and everything is possible, although not common, we could find even KK in villain’s range. 
Thanks for your massive contribution to the forum, I learn a lot from your posts!
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language