Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="gustav197poker, post: 6670976, member: 393841"]
In a blind duel the ranges tend to be wider. In a sample > 700 hands, we can look at % fold 3-bet (OOP) and use that data to our advantage.
Disregarding this information, I see that his PFR is pretty decent, so I'd go calling and 3-bet with KTs+.
The flop is a bit bad for us as we block QKs in opponent's range and the bluffs JT and AT who might be looking for some action here. That leaves us dominated with more AK combos, while beating some inferior hands that SB could PFR. I like the x/x line against a V that by default should have a slightly tighter range than ours, given that we dominate him in position.
The turn has a relative impact on ranges, as there are now some spade combos that V could be bluffing.
We don't have relevant blockers though: we don't have spades, we don't have J, and for that reason I'd rather fold here or bluff our hand, but which would be my last option. I would first look at his AF OTT and and his chances of folding on this texture.
The river is not as neutral as blind positions are being played. And V could have any bottom set, random hands that beat us. Here I would observe the WTSD stat, although it could be biased, since in reality thousands of hands are needed to have more accurate information.
IMO we have a standard fold OTR, if we don't fold on previou street.
Greetings.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language