Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="brunochano, post: 6133376, member: 451745"] Now I'm finally getting it but I have one curiosity. Assuming that our villain wouldn't call a pot sized bet and that we had no issues in our bankroll wouldn't be better betting something like 75% of the pot and requiring him to have 30% on this call so his call would be be a mistake but the probability of he calling would be higher then we are not denying so much equity( disconsidering the bankroll issue) but having more value on our play. Is it right to think like this? I'm still asking because even not having the right bankroll I'm totally commited to learning how to play poker and I'm pretty sure I'm going to play it for a long long time and I just want to be sure what is the best long term move because the idea of betting pot seems akward to me because I'm assuming that he would fold. And didn't said but I'm totally okay about going back home earlier if things don't go well as long as I make the +EV move but as I said bellow I wouldn't have enough experience to play other hands. Just to be clear what I said about bankroll was something that was occuring at that exactly moment and I got that I should play more exploitative but what if things weren't like this? Because I'm always having more money to play other games other times so in this case would'nt be getting the call for a wrong price a better move? I'm wondering if looking for his call I'm getting the most value from this hand and even making my life easier playing then other spots where I cannot have so much value and even knowledge about how to play. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us

Language