Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="primrose, post: 7136958, member: 1036998"]
I was looking at [URL='https://pokercoaching.com/preflop-charts']Jonathan Little's Exploitative Poker Hand Charts[/URL]. One thing that struck me as odd is the bottom right corner of the RFI range on the BN:

[ATTACH type="full" alt="1748966955192.png"]386251[/ATTACH]

Raising 32s is a bit wild, but what I really want to know is, why 32s over 42s, 52s, and 63s?

32s makes two straights (A2345 and 23456) so it's essentially a double-gapper, same as, e.g., 96s, which we're also raising. And one more than e.g. 84s or 73s, so it makes sense that we're not raising those. However, 42s and 52s and 63s also  make two straights each, so why are we opening 32s and not those?

It might just be "solver randomizes and we don't so we had to round some up to 1 and some to 0" but I think there's probably more to it. I asked GPT and it pointed out that 25s is basically not better than 23s because the 5 will never kick anyway. I guess that makes sense. But 36s is a little better. And even so, that still doesn't explain what 32s has above the others. But it might make sense to not be dominated or something?

Idk, this kind of narrow edge case is interesting to me even if it's super niche; curious if anyone has an idea.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

Search

Reply to thread

About CardsChat

Our Community

Our Site

Follow us